On average across the year,
no, Nebraska, United States is not hotter than
Columbia, Missouri
.
Nebraska, United States has an average temperature of 11°C/52°F and Columbia, Missouri has an average temperature of 14°C/57°F.
Nebraska, United States's hottest month is July, with an average maximum temperature of 31°C/88°F, which is approximately the same temperature as Columbia, Missouri's hottest month (also July, with an average maximum temperature of 31°C/88°F).
On average across the year, yes, Nebraska, United States is colder than Columbia, Missouri . Nebraska, United States has an average minimum temperature of 4°C/39°F and Columbia, Missouri has an average minimum temperature of 8°C/46°F.
On average across the year,
no, Nebraska, United States has less rain than
Columbia, Missouri. Nebraska, United States has an average annual rainfall of 764mm and Columbia, Missouri has an average annual rainfall of 1209mm.
Nebraska, United States's wettest month is May, with an average monthly rainfall of 133mm, which is drier than Columbia, Missouri's wettest month (June, with an average monthly rainfall of 147mm).
The midpoint of Nebraska, United States is approximately 436 miles (702km) north west of Columbia, Missouri.
Yes, Nebraska, United States is further west than Columbia, Missouri. The midpoint of Nebraska, United States is further west by approximately 384 miles (618km).
No, Nebraska, United States is not further east than Columbia, Missouri.
Yes, Nebraska, United States is further north than Columbia, Missouri. The midpoint of Nebraska, United States is further north by approximately 176 miles (283km).
No, Nebraska, United States is not further south than Columbia, Missouri.
The midpoint of Columbia, Missouri is approximately 436 miles (702km) south east of Nebraska, United States.
No, Columbia, Missouri is not further west than Nebraska, United States.
Yes, Columbia, Missouri is further east than Nebraska, United States. The midpoint of Columbia, Missouri is further east by approximately 384 miles (618km).
No, Columbia, Missouri is not further north than Nebraska, United States.
Yes, Columbia, Missouri is further south than Nebraska, United States. The midpoint of Columbia, Missouri is further south by approximately 176 miles (283km).
Yes, Nebraska is more populated than Columbia.
Nebraska has a population of 1,963,692 and Columbia has a population of 119,108
which means that Nebraska has 1,844,584 more people than Columbia.
That makes Nebraska 17 times more populated than Columbia.
No, Nebraska is not less populated than Columbia.
Nebraska has a population of 1,963,692 and Columbia has a population of 119,108
which means that Nebraska has 1,844,584 more people than Columbia.
That makes Nebraska 17 times more populated than Columbia.
No, Columbia is not more populated than Nebraska.
Columbia has a population of 119,108 and Nebraska has a population of 1,963,692
which means that Columbia has 1,844,584 fewer people than Nebraska.
That makes Columbia 17 times less populated than Nebraska.
Yes, Columbia is less populated than Nebraska.
Columbia has a population of 119,108 and Nebraska has a population of 1,963,692
which means that Columbia has 1,844,584 fewer people than Nebraska.
That makes Columbia 17 times less populated than Nebraska.