On average across the year,
no, New Hampshire, United States is not hotter than
Columbia, Missouri
.
New Hampshire, United States has an average temperature of 9°C/48°F and Columbia, Missouri has an average temperature of 14°C/57°F.
New Hampshire, United States's hottest month is July, with an average maximum temperature of 29°C/84°F, which is not hotter than Columbia, Missouri's hottest month (also July, with an average maximum temperature of 31°C/88°F).
On average across the year, yes, New Hampshire, United States is colder than Columbia, Missouri . New Hampshire, United States has an average minimum temperature of 3°C/37°F and Columbia, Missouri has an average minimum temperature of 8°C/46°F.
On average across the year,
no, New Hampshire, United States has less rain than
Columbia, Missouri. New Hampshire, United States has an average annual rainfall of 1196mm and Columbia, Missouri has an average annual rainfall of 1209mm.
New Hampshire, United States's wettest month is October, with an average monthly rainfall of 130mm, which is drier than Columbia, Missouri's wettest month (June, with an average monthly rainfall of 147mm).
The midpoint of New Hampshire, United States is approximately 1,117 miles (1,798km) east of Columbia, Missouri.
No, New Hampshire, United States is not further west than Columbia, Missouri.
Yes, New Hampshire, United States is further east than Columbia, Missouri. The midpoint of New Hampshire, United States is further east by approximately 1,010 miles (1,625km).
Yes, New Hampshire, United States is further north than Columbia, Missouri. The midpoint of New Hampshire, United States is further north by approximately 293 miles (472km).
No, New Hampshire, United States is not further south than Columbia, Missouri.
The midpoint of Columbia, Missouri is approximately 1,117 miles (1,798km) west of New Hampshire, United States.
Yes, Columbia, Missouri is further west than New Hampshire, United States. The midpoint of Columbia, Missouri is further west by approximately 1,010 miles (1,625km).
No, Columbia, Missouri is not further east than New Hampshire, United States.
No, Columbia, Missouri is not further north than New Hampshire, United States.
Yes, Columbia, Missouri is further south than New Hampshire, United States. The midpoint of Columbia, Missouri is further south by approximately 293 miles (472km).
Yes, New Hampshire is more populated than Columbia.
New Hampshire has a population of 1,388,992 and Columbia has a population of 119,108
which means that New Hampshire has 1,269,884 more people than Columbia.
That makes New Hampshire 12 times more populated than Columbia.
No, New Hampshire is not less populated than Columbia.
New Hampshire has a population of 1,388,992 and Columbia has a population of 119,108
which means that New Hampshire has 1,269,884 more people than Columbia.
That makes New Hampshire 12 times more populated than Columbia.
No, Columbia is not more populated than New Hampshire.
Columbia has a population of 119,108 and New Hampshire has a population of 1,388,992
which means that Columbia has 1,269,884 fewer people than New Hampshire.
That makes Columbia 12 times less populated than New Hampshire.
Yes, Columbia is less populated than New Hampshire.
Columbia has a population of 119,108 and New Hampshire has a population of 1,388,992
which means that Columbia has 1,269,884 fewer people than New Hampshire.
That makes Columbia 12 times less populated than New Hampshire.