On average across the year,
no, South Dakota, United States is not hotter than
Columbia, Missouri
.
South Dakota, United States has an average temperature of 8°C/46°F and Columbia, Missouri has an average temperature of 14°C/57°F.
South Dakota, United States's hottest month is July, with an average maximum temperature of 30°C/86°F, which is not hotter than Columbia, Missouri's hottest month (also July, with an average maximum temperature of 31°C/88°F).
On average across the year, yes, South Dakota, United States is colder than Columbia, Missouri . South Dakota, United States has an average minimum temperature of 1°C/34°F and Columbia, Missouri has an average minimum temperature of 8°C/46°F.
On average across the year,
no, South Dakota, United States has less rain than
Columbia, Missouri. South Dakota, United States has an average annual rainfall of 498mm and Columbia, Missouri has an average annual rainfall of 1209mm.
South Dakota, United States's wettest month is May, with an average monthly rainfall of 74mm, which is drier than Columbia, Missouri's wettest month (June, with an average monthly rainfall of 147mm).
The midpoint of South Dakota, United States is approximately 523 miles (841km) north west of Columbia, Missouri.
Yes, South Dakota, United States is further west than Columbia, Missouri. The midpoint of South Dakota, United States is further west by approximately 360 miles (579km).
No, South Dakota, United States is not further east than Columbia, Missouri.
Yes, South Dakota, United States is further north than Columbia, Missouri. The midpoint of South Dakota, United States is further north by approximately 347 miles (558km).
No, South Dakota, United States is not further south than Columbia, Missouri.
The midpoint of Columbia, Missouri is approximately 523 miles (841km) south east of South Dakota, United States.
No, Columbia, Missouri is not further west than South Dakota, United States.
Yes, Columbia, Missouri is further east than South Dakota, United States. The midpoint of Columbia, Missouri is further east by approximately 360 miles (579km).
No, Columbia, Missouri is not further north than South Dakota, United States.
Yes, Columbia, Missouri is further south than South Dakota, United States. The midpoint of Columbia, Missouri is further south by approximately 347 miles (558km).
Yes, South Dakota is more populated than Columbia.
South Dakota has a population of 895,376 and Columbia has a population of 119,108
which means that South Dakota has 776,268 more people than Columbia.
That makes South Dakota 8 times more populated than Columbia.
No, South Dakota is not less populated than Columbia.
South Dakota has a population of 895,376 and Columbia has a population of 119,108
which means that South Dakota has 776,268 more people than Columbia.
That makes South Dakota 8 times more populated than Columbia.
No, Columbia is not more populated than South Dakota.
Columbia has a population of 119,108 and South Dakota has a population of 895,376
which means that Columbia has 776,268 fewer people than South Dakota.
That makes Columbia 8 times less populated than South Dakota.
Yes, Columbia is less populated than South Dakota.
Columbia has a population of 119,108 and South Dakota has a population of 895,376
which means that Columbia has 776,268 fewer people than South Dakota.
That makes Columbia 8 times less populated than South Dakota.