On average across the year,
no, Montana, United States is not hotter than
New Hampshire, United States
.
Montana, United States has an average temperature of 7°C/45°F and New Hampshire, United States has an average temperature of 9°C/48°F.
Montana, United States's hottest month is July, with an average maximum temperature of 29°C/84°F, which is approximately the same temperature as New Hampshire, United States's hottest month (also July, with an average maximum temperature of 29°C/84°F).
On average across the year, yes, Montana, United States is colder than New Hampshire, United States . Montana, United States has an average minimum temperature of 0°C/32°F and New Hampshire, United States has an average minimum temperature of 3°C/37°F.
On average across the year,
no, Montana, United States has less rain than
New Hampshire, United States. Montana, United States has an average annual rainfall of 509mm and New Hampshire, United States has an average annual rainfall of 1196mm.
Montana, United States's wettest month is May, with an average monthly rainfall of 69mm, which is drier than New Hampshire, United States's wettest month (October, with an average monthly rainfall of 130mm).
The midpoint of Montana, United States is approximately 1,891 miles (3,044km) west of New Hampshire, United States.
Yes, Montana, United States is further west than New Hampshire, United States. The midpoint of Montana, United States is further west by approximately 1,770 miles (2,849km).
No, Montana, United States is not further east than New Hampshire, United States.
Yes, Montana, United States is further north than New Hampshire, United States. The midpoint of Montana, United States is further north by approximately 255 miles (410km).
No, Montana, United States is not further south than New Hampshire, United States.
Yes, Montana is bigger than New Hampshire.
Montana has an area of 380,831 km2 (986,352 miles2) and New Hampshire has an area of 24,214 km2 (62,714 miles2)
which means that Montana is 356,617 km2 (923,638 miles2) bigger than New Hampshire.
That makes Montana 16 times bigger than New Hampshire.
No, Montana is not smaller than New Hampshire.
Montana has an area of 380,831 km2 (986,352 miles2) and New Hampshire has an area of 24,214 km2 (62,714 miles2)
which means that Montana is 356,617 km2 (923,638 miles2) bigger than New Hampshire.
That makes Montana 16 times bigger than New Hampshire.
The midpoint of New Hampshire, United States is approximately 1,891 miles (3,044km) east of Montana, United States.
No, New Hampshire, United States is not further west than Montana, United States.
Yes, New Hampshire, United States is further east than Montana, United States. The midpoint of New Hampshire, United States is further east by approximately 1,770 miles (2,849km).
No, New Hampshire, United States is not further north than Montana, United States.
Yes, New Hampshire, United States is further south than Montana, United States. The midpoint of New Hampshire, United States is further south by approximately 255 miles (410km).
No, New Hampshire is smaller than Montana.
New Hampshire has an area of 24,214 km2 (62,714 miles2) and Montana has an area of 380,831 km2 (986,352 miles2)
which means that New Hampshire is 356,617 km2 (923,638 miles2) smaller than Montana.
That makes New Hampshire 16 times smaller than Montana.
Yes, New Hampshire is smaller than Montana.
New Hampshire has an area of 24,214 km2 (62,714 miles2) and Montana has an area of 380,831 km2 (986,352 miles2)
which means that New Hampshire is 356,617 km2 (923,638 miles2) smaller than Montana.
That makes New Hampshire 16 times smaller than Montana.
No, Montana is not more populated than New Hampshire.
Montana has a population of 1,104,271 and New Hampshire has a population of 1,388,992
which means that Montana has 284,721 fewer people than New Hampshire.
That makes Montana 1 times less populated than New Hampshire.
Yes, Montana is less populated than New Hampshire.
Montana has a population of 1,104,271 and New Hampshire has a population of 1,388,992
which means that Montana has 284,721 fewer people than New Hampshire.
That makes Montana 1 times less populated than New Hampshire.
Yes, New Hampshire is more populated than Montana.
New Hampshire has a population of 1,388,992 and Montana has a population of 1,104,271
which means that New Hampshire has 284,721 more people than Montana.
That makes New Hampshire 1 times more populated than Montana.
No, New Hampshire is not less populated than Montana.
New Hampshire has a population of 1,388,992 and Montana has a population of 1,104,271
which means that New Hampshire has 284,721 more people than Montana.
That makes New Hampshire 1 times more populated than Montana.