On average across the year,
no, New Hampshire, United States is not hotter than
Burbank, California
.
New Hampshire, United States has an average temperature of 9°C/48°F and Burbank, California has an average temperature of 19°C/66°F.
New Hampshire, United States's hottest month is July, with an average maximum temperature of 29°C/84°F, which is approximately the same temperature as Burbank, California's hottest month (August, with an average maximum temperature of 29°C/84°F).
On average across the year, yes, New Hampshire, United States is colder than Burbank, California . New Hampshire, United States has an average minimum temperature of 3°C/37°F and Burbank, California has an average minimum temperature of 14°C/57°F.
On average across the year,
yes, New Hampshire, United States has more rain than
Burbank, California. New Hampshire, United States has an average annual rainfall of 1196mm and Burbank, California has an average annual rainfall of 306mm.
New Hampshire, United States's wettest month is October, with an average monthly rainfall of 130mm, which is wetter than Burbank, California's wettest month (December, with an average monthly rainfall of 78mm).
The midpoint of New Hampshire, United States is approximately 2,561 miles (4,122km) east of Burbank, California.
No, New Hampshire, United States is not further west than Burbank, California.
Yes, New Hampshire, United States is further east than Burbank, California. The midpoint of New Hampshire, United States is further east by approximately 2,176 miles (3,502km).
Yes, New Hampshire, United States is further north than Burbank, California. The midpoint of New Hampshire, United States is further north by approximately 623 miles (1,002km).
No, New Hampshire, United States is not further south than Burbank, California.
The midpoint of Burbank, California is approximately 2,561 miles (4,122km) west of New Hampshire, United States.
Yes, Burbank, California is further west than New Hampshire, United States. The midpoint of Burbank, California is further west by approximately 2,176 miles (3,502km).
No, Burbank, California is not further east than New Hampshire, United States.
No, Burbank, California is not further north than New Hampshire, United States.
Yes, Burbank, California is further south than New Hampshire, United States. The midpoint of Burbank, California is further south by approximately 623 miles (1,002km).
Yes, New Hampshire is more populated than Burbank.
New Hampshire has a population of 1,388,992 and Burbank has a population of 105,319
which means that New Hampshire has 1,283,673 more people than Burbank.
That makes New Hampshire 13 times more populated than Burbank.
No, New Hampshire is not less populated than Burbank.
New Hampshire has a population of 1,388,992 and Burbank has a population of 105,319
which means that New Hampshire has 1,283,673 more people than Burbank.
That makes New Hampshire 13 times more populated than Burbank.
No, Burbank is not more populated than New Hampshire.
Burbank has a population of 105,319 and New Hampshire has a population of 1,388,992
which means that Burbank has 1,283,673 fewer people than New Hampshire.
That makes Burbank 13 times less populated than New Hampshire.
Yes, Burbank is less populated than New Hampshire.
Burbank has a population of 105,319 and New Hampshire has a population of 1,388,992
which means that Burbank has 1,283,673 fewer people than New Hampshire.
That makes Burbank 13 times less populated than New Hampshire.