On average across the year,
no, New Hampshire, United States is not hotter than
Lake Forest, California
.
New Hampshire, United States has an average temperature of 9°C/48°F and Lake Forest, California has an average temperature of 20°C/68°F.
New Hampshire, United States's hottest month is July, with an average maximum temperature of 29°C/84°F, which is not hotter than Lake Forest, California's hottest month (August, with an average maximum temperature of 31°C/88°F).
On average across the year, yes, New Hampshire, United States is colder than Lake Forest, California . New Hampshire, United States has an average minimum temperature of 3°C/37°F and Lake Forest, California has an average minimum temperature of 14°C/57°F.
On average across the year,
yes, New Hampshire, United States has more rain than
Lake Forest, California. New Hampshire, United States has an average annual rainfall of 1196mm and Lake Forest, California has an average annual rainfall of 245mm.
New Hampshire, United States's wettest month is October, with an average monthly rainfall of 130mm, which is wetter than Lake Forest, California's wettest month (December, with an average monthly rainfall of 61mm).
The midpoint of New Hampshire, United States is approximately 2,548 miles (4,100km) east of Lake Forest, California.
No, New Hampshire, United States is not further west than Lake Forest, California.
Yes, New Hampshire, United States is further east than Lake Forest, California. The midpoint of New Hampshire, United States is further east by approximately 2,136 miles (3,438km).
Yes, New Hampshire, United States is further north than Lake Forest, California. The midpoint of New Hampshire, United States is further north by approximately 660 miles (1,062km).
No, New Hampshire, United States is not further south than Lake Forest, California.
The midpoint of Lake Forest, California is approximately 2,548 miles (4,100km) west of New Hampshire, United States.
Yes, Lake Forest, California is further west than New Hampshire, United States. The midpoint of Lake Forest, California is further west by approximately 2,136 miles (3,438km).
No, Lake Forest, California is not further east than New Hampshire, United States.
No, Lake Forest, California is not further north than New Hampshire, United States.
Yes, Lake Forest, California is further south than New Hampshire, United States. The midpoint of Lake Forest, California is further south by approximately 660 miles (1,062km).
Yes, New Hampshire is more populated than Lake Forest.
New Hampshire has a population of 1,388,992 and Lake Forest has a population of 82,492
which means that New Hampshire has 1,306,500 more people than Lake Forest.
That makes New Hampshire 17 times more populated than Lake Forest.
No, New Hampshire is not less populated than Lake Forest.
New Hampshire has a population of 1,388,992 and Lake Forest has a population of 82,492
which means that New Hampshire has 1,306,500 more people than Lake Forest.
That makes New Hampshire 17 times more populated than Lake Forest.
No, Lake Forest is not more populated than New Hampshire.
Lake Forest has a population of 82,492 and New Hampshire has a population of 1,388,992
which means that Lake Forest has 1,306,500 fewer people than New Hampshire.
That makes Lake Forest 17 times less populated than New Hampshire.
Yes, Lake Forest is less populated than New Hampshire.
Lake Forest has a population of 82,492 and New Hampshire has a population of 1,388,992
which means that Lake Forest has 1,306,500 fewer people than New Hampshire.
That makes Lake Forest 17 times less populated than New Hampshire.