On average across the year,
no, New Hampshire, United States is not hotter than
Lancaster, California
.
New Hampshire, United States has an average temperature of 9°C/48°F and Lancaster, California has an average temperature of 17°C/63°F.
New Hampshire, United States's hottest month is July, with an average maximum temperature of 29°C/84°F, which is not hotter than Lancaster, California's hottest month (August, with an average maximum temperature of 33°C/91°F).
On average across the year, yes, New Hampshire, United States is colder than Lancaster, California . New Hampshire, United States has an average minimum temperature of 3°C/37°F and Lancaster, California has an average minimum temperature of 11°C/52°F.
The midpoint of New Hampshire, United States is approximately 2,536 miles (4,081km) east of Lancaster, California.
No, New Hampshire, United States is not further west than Lancaster, California.
Yes, New Hampshire, United States is further east than Lancaster, California. The midpoint of New Hampshire, United States is further east by approximately 2,178 miles (3,505km).
Yes, New Hampshire, United States is further north than Lancaster, California. The midpoint of New Hampshire, United States is further north by approximately 587 miles (945km).
No, New Hampshire, United States is not further south than Lancaster, California.
The midpoint of Lancaster, California is approximately 2,536 miles (4,081km) west of New Hampshire, United States.
Yes, Lancaster, California is further west than New Hampshire, United States. The midpoint of Lancaster, California is further west by approximately 2,178 miles (3,505km).
No, Lancaster, California is not further east than New Hampshire, United States.
No, Lancaster, California is not further north than New Hampshire, United States.
Yes, Lancaster, California is further south than New Hampshire, United States. The midpoint of Lancaster, California is further south by approximately 587 miles (945km).
Yes, New Hampshire is more populated than Lancaster.
New Hampshire has a population of 1,388,992 and Lancaster has a population of 161,103
which means that New Hampshire has 1,227,889 more people than Lancaster.
That makes New Hampshire 9 times more populated than Lancaster.
No, New Hampshire is not less populated than Lancaster.
New Hampshire has a population of 1,388,992 and Lancaster has a population of 161,103
which means that New Hampshire has 1,227,889 more people than Lancaster.
That makes New Hampshire 9 times more populated than Lancaster.
No, Lancaster is not more populated than New Hampshire.
Lancaster has a population of 161,103 and New Hampshire has a population of 1,388,992
which means that Lancaster has 1,227,889 fewer people than New Hampshire.
That makes Lancaster 9 times less populated than New Hampshire.
Yes, Lancaster is less populated than New Hampshire.
Lancaster has a population of 161,103 and New Hampshire has a population of 1,388,992
which means that Lancaster has 1,227,889 fewer people than New Hampshire.
That makes Lancaster 9 times less populated than New Hampshire.