On average across the year,
no, New Hampshire, United States is not hotter than
Omaha, Nebraska
.
New Hampshire, United States has an average temperature of 9°C/48°F and Omaha, Nebraska has an average temperature of 12°C/54°F.
New Hampshire, United States's hottest month is July, with an average maximum temperature of 29°C/84°F, which is not hotter than Omaha, Nebraska's hottest month (also July, with an average maximum temperature of 31°C/88°F).
On average across the year, yes, New Hampshire, United States is colder than Omaha, Nebraska . New Hampshire, United States has an average minimum temperature of 3°C/37°F and Omaha, Nebraska has an average minimum temperature of 6°C/43°F.
On average across the year,
yes, New Hampshire, United States has more rain than
Omaha, Nebraska. New Hampshire, United States has an average annual rainfall of 1196mm and Omaha, Nebraska has an average annual rainfall of 896mm.
New Hampshire, United States's wettest month is October, with an average monthly rainfall of 130mm, which is drier than Omaha, Nebraska's wettest month (August, with an average monthly rainfall of 149mm).
The midpoint of New Hampshire, United States is approximately 1,250 miles (2,011km) east of Omaha, Nebraska.
No, New Hampshire, United States is not further west than Omaha, Nebraska.
Yes, New Hampshire, United States is further east than Omaha, Nebraska. The midpoint of New Hampshire, United States is further east by approximately 1,209 miles (1,946km).
Yes, New Hampshire, United States is further north than Omaha, Nebraska. The midpoint of New Hampshire, United States is further north by approximately 134 miles (215km).
No, New Hampshire, United States is not further south than Omaha, Nebraska.
The midpoint of Omaha, Nebraska is approximately 1,250 miles (2,011km) west of New Hampshire, United States.
Yes, Omaha, Nebraska is further west than New Hampshire, United States. The midpoint of Omaha, Nebraska is further west by approximately 1,209 miles (1,946km).
No, Omaha, Nebraska is not further east than New Hampshire, United States.
No, Omaha, Nebraska is not further north than New Hampshire, United States.
Yes, Omaha, Nebraska is further south than New Hampshire, United States. The midpoint of Omaha, Nebraska is further south by approximately 134 miles (215km).
Yes, New Hampshire is more populated than Omaha.
New Hampshire has a population of 1,388,992 and Omaha has a population of 486,051
which means that New Hampshire has 902,941 more people than Omaha.
That makes New Hampshire 3 times more populated than Omaha.
No, New Hampshire is not less populated than Omaha.
New Hampshire has a population of 1,388,992 and Omaha has a population of 486,051
which means that New Hampshire has 902,941 more people than Omaha.
That makes New Hampshire 3 times more populated than Omaha.
No, Omaha is not more populated than New Hampshire.
Omaha has a population of 486,051 and New Hampshire has a population of 1,388,992
which means that Omaha has 902,941 fewer people than New Hampshire.
That makes Omaha 3 times less populated than New Hampshire.
Yes, Omaha is less populated than New Hampshire.
Omaha has a population of 486,051 and New Hampshire has a population of 1,388,992
which means that Omaha has 902,941 fewer people than New Hampshire.
That makes Omaha 3 times less populated than New Hampshire.