On average across the year,
no, New Hampshire, United States is not hotter than
Pasadena, California
.
New Hampshire, United States has an average temperature of 9°C/48°F and Pasadena, California has an average temperature of 19°C/66°F.
New Hampshire, United States's hottest month is July, with an average maximum temperature of 29°C/84°F, which is approximately the same temperature as Pasadena, California's hottest month (August, with an average maximum temperature of 29°C/84°F).
On average across the year, yes, New Hampshire, United States is colder than Pasadena, California . New Hampshire, United States has an average minimum temperature of 3°C/37°F and Pasadena, California has an average minimum temperature of 14°C/57°F.
On average across the year,
yes, New Hampshire, United States has more rain than
Pasadena, California. New Hampshire, United States has an average annual rainfall of 1196mm and Pasadena, California has an average annual rainfall of 306mm.
New Hampshire, United States's wettest month is October, with an average monthly rainfall of 130mm, which is wetter than Pasadena, California's wettest month (December, with an average monthly rainfall of 78mm).
The midpoint of New Hampshire, United States is approximately 2,554 miles (4,111km) east of Pasadena, California.
No, New Hampshire, United States is not further west than Pasadena, California.
Yes, New Hampshire, United States is further east than Pasadena, California. The midpoint of New Hampshire, United States is further east by approximately 2,167 miles (3,487km).
Yes, New Hampshire, United States is further north than Pasadena, California. The midpoint of New Hampshire, United States is further north by approximately 625 miles (1,006km).
No, New Hampshire, United States is not further south than Pasadena, California.
The midpoint of Pasadena, California is approximately 2,554 miles (4,111km) west of New Hampshire, United States.
Yes, Pasadena, California is further west than New Hampshire, United States. The midpoint of Pasadena, California is further west by approximately 2,167 miles (3,487km).
No, Pasadena, California is not further east than New Hampshire, United States.
No, Pasadena, California is not further north than New Hampshire, United States.
Yes, Pasadena, California is further south than New Hampshire, United States. The midpoint of Pasadena, California is further south by approximately 625 miles (1,006km).
Yes, New Hampshire is more populated than Pasadena.
New Hampshire has a population of 1,388,992 and Pasadena has a population of 142,250
which means that New Hampshire has 1,246,742 more people than Pasadena.
That makes New Hampshire 10 times more populated than Pasadena.
No, New Hampshire is not less populated than Pasadena.
New Hampshire has a population of 1,388,992 and Pasadena has a population of 142,250
which means that New Hampshire has 1,246,742 more people than Pasadena.
That makes New Hampshire 10 times more populated than Pasadena.
No, Pasadena is not more populated than New Hampshire.
Pasadena has a population of 142,250 and New Hampshire has a population of 1,388,992
which means that Pasadena has 1,246,742 fewer people than New Hampshire.
That makes Pasadena 10 times less populated than New Hampshire.
Yes, Pasadena is less populated than New Hampshire.
Pasadena has a population of 142,250 and New Hampshire has a population of 1,388,992
which means that Pasadena has 1,246,742 fewer people than New Hampshire.
That makes Pasadena 10 times less populated than New Hampshire.