On average across the year,
yes, Republic of the Congo is hotter than
New Hampshire, United States
.
Republic of the Congo has an average temperature of 26°C/79°F and New Hampshire, United States has an average temperature of 9°C/48°F.
Republic of the Congo's hottest month is February, with an average maximum temperature of 32°C/90°F, which is hotter than New Hampshire, United States's hottest month (July, with an average maximum temperature of 29°C/84°F).
On average across the year, no, Republic of the Congo is not colder than New Hampshire, United States . Republic of the Congo has an average minimum temperature of 21°C/70°F and New Hampshire, United States has an average minimum temperature of 3°C/37°F.
On average across the year,
no, Republic of the Congo has less rain than
New Hampshire, United States. Republic of the Congo has an average annual rainfall of 522mm and New Hampshire, United States has an average annual rainfall of 1196mm.
Republic of the Congo's wettest month is November, with an average monthly rainfall of 76mm, which is drier than New Hampshire, United States's wettest month (October, with an average monthly rainfall of 130mm).
The midpoint of Republic of the Congo is approximately 6,098 miles (9,814km) south east of New Hampshire, United States.
No, Republic of the Congo is not further west than New Hampshire, United States.
Yes, Republic of the Congo is further east than New Hampshire, United States. The midpoint of Republic of the Congo is further east by approximately 5,608 miles (9,025km).
No, Republic of the Congo is not further north than New Hampshire, United States.
Yes, Republic of the Congo is further south than New Hampshire, United States. The midpoint of Republic of the Congo is further south by approximately 3,000 miles (4,828km).
Yes, Republic of the Congo is bigger than New Hampshire.
Republic of the Congo has an area of 341,500 km2 (884,485 miles2) and New Hampshire has an area of 24,214 km2 (62,714 miles2)
which means that Republic of the Congo is 317,286 km2 (821,771 miles2) bigger than New Hampshire.
That makes Republic of the Congo 14 times bigger than New Hampshire.
No, Republic of the Congo is not smaller than New Hampshire.
Republic of the Congo has an area of 341,500 km2 (884,485 miles2) and New Hampshire has an area of 24,214 km2 (62,714 miles2)
which means that Republic of the Congo is 317,286 km2 (821,771 miles2) bigger than New Hampshire.
That makes Republic of the Congo 14 times bigger than New Hampshire.
The midpoint of New Hampshire, United States is approximately 6,098 miles (9,814km) north west of Republic of the Congo.
Yes, New Hampshire, United States is further west than Republic of the Congo. The midpoint of New Hampshire, United States is further west by approximately 5,608 miles (9,025km).
No, New Hampshire, United States is not further east than Republic of the Congo.
Yes, New Hampshire, United States is further north than Republic of the Congo. The midpoint of New Hampshire, United States is further north by approximately 3,000 miles (4,828km).
No, New Hampshire, United States is not further south than Republic of the Congo.
No, New Hampshire is smaller than Republic of the Congo.
New Hampshire has an area of 24,214 km2 (62,714 miles2) and Republic of the Congo has an area of 341,500 km2 (884,485 miles2)
which means that New Hampshire is 317,286 km2 (821,771 miles2) smaller than Republic of the Congo.
That makes New Hampshire 14 times smaller than Republic of the Congo.
Yes, New Hampshire is smaller than Republic of the Congo.
New Hampshire has an area of 24,214 km2 (62,714 miles2) and Republic of the Congo has an area of 341,500 km2 (884,485 miles2)
which means that New Hampshire is 317,286 km2 (821,771 miles2) smaller than Republic of the Congo.
That makes New Hampshire 14 times smaller than Republic of the Congo.
Yes, Republic of the Congo is more populated than New Hampshire.
Republic of the Congo has a population of 5,546,307 and New Hampshire has a population of 1,388,992
which means that Republic of the Congo has 4,157,315 more people than New Hampshire.
That makes Republic of the Congo 4 times more populated than New Hampshire.
No, Republic of the Congo is not less populated than New Hampshire.
Republic of the Congo has a population of 5,546,307 and New Hampshire has a population of 1,388,992
which means that Republic of the Congo has 4,157,315 more people than New Hampshire.
That makes Republic of the Congo 4 times more populated than New Hampshire.
No, New Hampshire is not more populated than Republic of the Congo.
New Hampshire has a population of 1,388,992 and Republic of the Congo has a population of 5,546,307
which means that New Hampshire has 4,157,315 fewer people than Republic of the Congo.
That makes New Hampshire 4 times less populated than Republic of the Congo.
Yes, New Hampshire is less populated than Republic of the Congo.
New Hampshire has a population of 1,388,992 and Republic of the Congo has a population of 5,546,307
which means that New Hampshire has 4,157,315 fewer people than Republic of the Congo.
That makes New Hampshire 4 times less populated than Republic of the Congo.