On average across the year,
no, New Hampshire, United States is not hotter than
San Francisco, California
.
New Hampshire, United States has an average temperature of 9°C/48°F and San Francisco, California has an average temperature of 15°C/59°F.
New Hampshire, United States's hottest month is July, with an average maximum temperature of 29°C/84°F, which is hotter than San Francisco, California's hottest month (September, with an average maximum temperature of 24°C/75°F).
On average across the year, yes, New Hampshire, United States is colder than San Francisco, California . New Hampshire, United States has an average minimum temperature of 3°C/37°F and San Francisco, California has an average minimum temperature of 10°C/50°F.
On average across the year,
yes, New Hampshire, United States has more rain than
San Francisco, California. New Hampshire, United States has an average annual rainfall of 1196mm and San Francisco, California has an average annual rainfall of 455mm.
New Hampshire, United States's wettest month is October, with an average monthly rainfall of 130mm, which is wetter than San Francisco, California's wettest month (December, with an average monthly rainfall of 98mm).
The midpoint of New Hampshire, United States is approximately 2,657 miles (4,276km) east of San Francisco, California.
No, New Hampshire, United States is not further west than San Francisco, California.
Yes, New Hampshire, United States is further east than San Francisco, California. The midpoint of New Hampshire, United States is further east by approximately 2,448 miles (3,940km).
Yes, New Hampshire, United States is further north than San Francisco, California. The midpoint of New Hampshire, United States is further north by approximately 375 miles (603km).
No, New Hampshire, United States is not further south than San Francisco, California.
The midpoint of San Francisco, California is approximately 2,657 miles (4,276km) west of New Hampshire, United States.
Yes, San Francisco, California is further west than New Hampshire, United States. The midpoint of San Francisco, California is further west by approximately 2,448 miles (3,940km).
No, San Francisco, California is not further east than New Hampshire, United States.
No, San Francisco, California is not further north than New Hampshire, United States.
Yes, San Francisco, California is further south than New Hampshire, United States. The midpoint of San Francisco, California is further south by approximately 375 miles (603km).
Yes, New Hampshire is more populated than San Francisco.
New Hampshire has a population of 1,388,992 and San Francisco has a population of 864,816
which means that New Hampshire has 524,176 more people than San Francisco.
That makes New Hampshire 2 times more populated than San Francisco.
No, New Hampshire is not less populated than San Francisco.
New Hampshire has a population of 1,388,992 and San Francisco has a population of 864,816
which means that New Hampshire has 524,176 more people than San Francisco.
That makes New Hampshire 2 times more populated than San Francisco.
No, San Francisco is not more populated than New Hampshire.
San Francisco has a population of 864,816 and New Hampshire has a population of 1,388,992
which means that San Francisco has 524,176 fewer people than New Hampshire.
That makes San Francisco 2 times less populated than New Hampshire.
Yes, San Francisco is less populated than New Hampshire.
San Francisco has a population of 864,816 and New Hampshire has a population of 1,388,992
which means that San Francisco has 524,176 fewer people than New Hampshire.
That makes San Francisco 2 times less populated than New Hampshire.