On average across the year,
yes, South Africa is hotter than
New Hampshire, United States
.
South Africa has an average temperature of 19°C/66°F and New Hampshire, United States has an average temperature of 9°C/48°F.
South Africa's hottest month is January, with an average maximum temperature of 30°C/86°F, which is hotter than New Hampshire, United States's hottest month (July, with an average maximum temperature of 29°C/84°F).
On average across the year, no, South Africa is not colder than New Hampshire, United States . South Africa has an average minimum temperature of 12°C/54°F and New Hampshire, United States has an average minimum temperature of 3°C/37°F.
On average across the year,
no, South Africa has less rain than
New Hampshire, United States. South Africa has an average annual rainfall of 446mm and New Hampshire, United States has an average annual rainfall of 1196mm.
South Africa's wettest month is December, with an average monthly rainfall of 70mm, which is drier than New Hampshire, United States's wettest month (October, with an average monthly rainfall of 130mm).
The midpoint of South Africa is approximately 7,836 miles (12,611km) south east of New Hampshire, United States.
No, South Africa is not further west than New Hampshire, United States.
Yes, South Africa is further east than New Hampshire, United States. The midpoint of South Africa is further east by approximately 2,509 miles (4,038km).
No, South Africa is not further north than New Hampshire, United States.
Yes, South Africa is further south than New Hampshire, United States. The midpoint of South Africa is further south by approximately 5,096 miles (8,201km).
Yes, South Africa is bigger than New Hampshire.
South Africa has an area of 1,214,470 km2 (3,145,477 miles2) and New Hampshire has an area of 24,214 km2 (62,714 miles2)
which means that South Africa is 1,190,256 km2 (3,082,763 miles2) bigger than New Hampshire.
That makes South Africa 50 times bigger than New Hampshire.
No, South Africa is not smaller than New Hampshire.
South Africa has an area of 1,214,470 km2 (3,145,477 miles2) and New Hampshire has an area of 24,214 km2 (62,714 miles2)
which means that South Africa is 1,190,256 km2 (3,082,763 miles2) bigger than New Hampshire.
That makes South Africa 50 times bigger than New Hampshire.
The midpoint of New Hampshire, United States is approximately 7,836 miles (12,611km) north west of South Africa.
Yes, New Hampshire, United States is further west than South Africa. The midpoint of New Hampshire, United States is further west by approximately 2,509 miles (4,038km).
No, New Hampshire, United States is not further east than South Africa.
Yes, New Hampshire, United States is further north than South Africa. The midpoint of New Hampshire, United States is further north by approximately 5,096 miles (8,201km).
No, New Hampshire, United States is not further south than South Africa.
No, New Hampshire is smaller than South Africa.
New Hampshire has an area of 24,214 km2 (62,714 miles2) and South Africa has an area of 1,214,470 km2 (3,145,477 miles2)
which means that New Hampshire is 1,190,256 km2 (3,082,763 miles2) smaller than South Africa.
That makes New Hampshire 50 times smaller than South Africa.
Yes, New Hampshire is smaller than South Africa.
New Hampshire has an area of 24,214 km2 (62,714 miles2) and South Africa has an area of 1,214,470 km2 (3,145,477 miles2)
which means that New Hampshire is 1,190,256 km2 (3,082,763 miles2) smaller than South Africa.
That makes New Hampshire 50 times smaller than South Africa.
Yes, South Africa is more populated than New Hampshire.
South Africa has a population of 57,516,665 and New Hampshire has a population of 1,388,992
which means that South Africa has 56,127,673 more people than New Hampshire.
That makes South Africa 41 times more populated than New Hampshire.
No, South Africa is not less populated than New Hampshire.
South Africa has a population of 57,516,665 and New Hampshire has a population of 1,388,992
which means that South Africa has 56,127,673 more people than New Hampshire.
That makes South Africa 41 times more populated than New Hampshire.
No, New Hampshire is not more populated than South Africa.
New Hampshire has a population of 1,388,992 and South Africa has a population of 57,516,665
which means that New Hampshire has 56,127,673 fewer people than South Africa.
That makes New Hampshire 41 times less populated than South Africa.
Yes, New Hampshire is less populated than South Africa.
New Hampshire has a population of 1,388,992 and South Africa has a population of 57,516,665
which means that New Hampshire has 56,127,673 fewer people than South Africa.
That makes New Hampshire 41 times less populated than South Africa.