On average across the year,
no, New Hampshire, United States is not hotter than
South San Francisco, California
.
New Hampshire, United States has an average temperature of 9°C/48°F and South San Francisco, California has an average temperature of 15°C/59°F.
New Hampshire, United States's hottest month is July, with an average maximum temperature of 29°C/84°F, which is hotter than South San Francisco, California's hottest month (September, with an average maximum temperature of 24°C/75°F).
On average across the year, yes, New Hampshire, United States is colder than South San Francisco, California . New Hampshire, United States has an average minimum temperature of 3°C/37°F and South San Francisco, California has an average minimum temperature of 10°C/50°F.
On average across the year,
yes, New Hampshire, United States has more rain than
South San Francisco, California. New Hampshire, United States has an average annual rainfall of 1196mm and South San Francisco, California has an average annual rainfall of 455mm.
New Hampshire, United States's wettest month is October, with an average monthly rainfall of 130mm, which is wetter than South San Francisco, California's wettest month (December, with an average monthly rainfall of 98mm).
The midpoint of New Hampshire, United States is approximately 2,659 miles (4,280km) east of South San Francisco, California.
No, New Hampshire, United States is not further west than South San Francisco, California.
Yes, New Hampshire, United States is further east than South San Francisco, California. The midpoint of New Hampshire, United States is further east by approximately 2,444 miles (3,933km).
Yes, New Hampshire, United States is further north than South San Francisco, California. The midpoint of New Hampshire, United States is further north by approximately 383 miles (616km).
No, New Hampshire, United States is not further south than South San Francisco, California.
The midpoint of South San Francisco, California is approximately 2,659 miles (4,280km) west of New Hampshire, United States.
Yes, South San Francisco, California is further west than New Hampshire, United States. The midpoint of South San Francisco, California is further west by approximately 2,444 miles (3,933km).
No, South San Francisco, California is not further east than New Hampshire, United States.
No, South San Francisco, California is not further north than New Hampshire, United States.
Yes, South San Francisco, California is further south than New Hampshire, United States. The midpoint of South San Francisco, California is further south by approximately 383 miles (616km).
Yes, New Hampshire is more populated than South San Francisco.
New Hampshire has a population of 1,388,992 and South San Francisco has a population of 67,271
which means that New Hampshire has 1,321,721 more people than South San Francisco.
That makes New Hampshire 21 times more populated than South San Francisco.
No, New Hampshire is not less populated than South San Francisco.
New Hampshire has a population of 1,388,992 and South San Francisco has a population of 67,271
which means that New Hampshire has 1,321,721 more people than South San Francisco.
That makes New Hampshire 21 times more populated than South San Francisco.
No, South San Francisco is not more populated than New Hampshire.
South San Francisco has a population of 67,271 and New Hampshire has a population of 1,388,992
which means that South San Francisco has 1,321,721 fewer people than New Hampshire.
That makes South San Francisco 21 times less populated than New Hampshire.
Yes, South San Francisco is less populated than New Hampshire.
South San Francisco has a population of 67,271 and New Hampshire has a population of 1,388,992
which means that South San Francisco has 1,321,721 fewer people than New Hampshire.
That makes South San Francisco 21 times less populated than New Hampshire.