On average across the year,
yes, Zimbabwe is hotter than
New Hampshire, United States
.
Zimbabwe has an average temperature of 19°C/66°F and New Hampshire, United States has an average temperature of 9°C/48°F.
Zimbabwe's hottest month is October, with an average maximum temperature of 30°C/86°F, which is hotter than New Hampshire, United States's hottest month (July, with an average maximum temperature of 29°C/84°F).
On average across the year, no, Zimbabwe is not colder than New Hampshire, United States . Zimbabwe has an average minimum temperature of 13°C/55°F and New Hampshire, United States has an average minimum temperature of 3°C/37°F.
On average across the year,
no, Zimbabwe has less rain than
New Hampshire, United States. Zimbabwe has an average annual rainfall of 340mm and New Hampshire, United States has an average annual rainfall of 1196mm.
Zimbabwe's wettest month is January, with an average monthly rainfall of 85mm, which is drier than New Hampshire, United States's wettest month (October, with an average monthly rainfall of 130mm).
The midpoint of Zimbabwe is approximately 7,640 miles (12,295km) south east of New Hampshire, United States.
No, Zimbabwe is not further west than New Hampshire, United States.
Yes, Zimbabwe is further east than New Hampshire, United States. The midpoint of Zimbabwe is further east by approximately 4,467 miles (7,189km).
No, Zimbabwe is not further north than New Hampshire, United States.
Yes, Zimbabwe is further south than New Hampshire, United States. The midpoint of Zimbabwe is further south by approximately 4,298 miles (6,917km).
Yes, Zimbabwe is bigger than New Hampshire.
Zimbabwe has an area of 386,847 km2 (1,001,934 miles2) and New Hampshire has an area of 24,214 km2 (62,714 miles2)
which means that Zimbabwe is 362,633 km2 (939,219 miles2) bigger than New Hampshire.
That makes Zimbabwe 16 times bigger than New Hampshire.
No, Zimbabwe is not smaller than New Hampshire.
Zimbabwe has an area of 386,847 km2 (1,001,934 miles2) and New Hampshire has an area of 24,214 km2 (62,714 miles2)
which means that Zimbabwe is 362,633 km2 (939,219 miles2) bigger than New Hampshire.
That makes Zimbabwe 16 times bigger than New Hampshire.
The midpoint of New Hampshire, United States is approximately 7,640 miles (12,295km) north west of Zimbabwe.
Yes, New Hampshire, United States is further west than Zimbabwe. The midpoint of New Hampshire, United States is further west by approximately 4,467 miles (7,189km).
No, New Hampshire, United States is not further east than Zimbabwe.
Yes, New Hampshire, United States is further north than Zimbabwe. The midpoint of New Hampshire, United States is further north by approximately 4,298 miles (6,917km).
No, New Hampshire, United States is not further south than Zimbabwe.
No, New Hampshire is smaller than Zimbabwe.
New Hampshire has an area of 24,214 km2 (62,714 miles2) and Zimbabwe has an area of 386,847 km2 (1,001,934 miles2)
which means that New Hampshire is 362,633 km2 (939,219 miles2) smaller than Zimbabwe.
That makes New Hampshire 16 times smaller than Zimbabwe.
Yes, New Hampshire is smaller than Zimbabwe.
New Hampshire has an area of 24,214 km2 (62,714 miles2) and Zimbabwe has an area of 386,847 km2 (1,001,934 miles2)
which means that New Hampshire is 362,633 km2 (939,219 miles2) smaller than Zimbabwe.
That makes New Hampshire 16 times smaller than Zimbabwe.
Yes, Zimbabwe is more populated than New Hampshire.
Zimbabwe has a population of 15,121,004 and New Hampshire has a population of 1,388,992
which means that Zimbabwe has 13,732,012 more people than New Hampshire.
That makes Zimbabwe 11 times more populated than New Hampshire.
No, Zimbabwe is not less populated than New Hampshire.
Zimbabwe has a population of 15,121,004 and New Hampshire has a population of 1,388,992
which means that Zimbabwe has 13,732,012 more people than New Hampshire.
That makes Zimbabwe 11 times more populated than New Hampshire.
No, New Hampshire is not more populated than Zimbabwe.
New Hampshire has a population of 1,388,992 and Zimbabwe has a population of 15,121,004
which means that New Hampshire has 13,732,012 fewer people than Zimbabwe.
That makes New Hampshire 11 times less populated than Zimbabwe.
Yes, New Hampshire is less populated than Zimbabwe.
New Hampshire has a population of 1,388,992 and Zimbabwe has a population of 15,121,004
which means that New Hampshire has 13,732,012 fewer people than Zimbabwe.
That makes New Hampshire 11 times less populated than Zimbabwe.