On average across the year,
yes, Massachusetts, United States is hotter than
South Dakota, United States
.
Massachusetts, United States has an average temperature of 11°C/52°F and South Dakota, United States has an average temperature of 8°C/46°F.
Massachusetts, United States's hottest month is July, with an average maximum temperature of 29°C/84°F, which is not hotter than South Dakota, United States's hottest month (also July, with an average maximum temperature of 30°C/86°F).
On average across the year, no, Massachusetts, United States is not colder than South Dakota, United States . Massachusetts, United States has an average minimum temperature of 5°C/41°F and South Dakota, United States has an average minimum temperature of 1°C/34°F.
On average across the year,
yes, Massachusetts, United States has more rain than
South Dakota, United States. Massachusetts, United States has an average annual rainfall of 1341mm and South Dakota, United States has an average annual rainfall of 498mm.
Massachusetts, United States's wettest month is October, with an average monthly rainfall of 151mm, which is wetter than South Dakota, United States's wettest month (May, with an average monthly rainfall of 74mm).
The midpoint of Massachusetts, United States is approximately 1,434 miles (2,307km) east of South Dakota, United States.
No, Massachusetts, United States is not further west than South Dakota, United States.
Yes, Massachusetts, United States is further east than South Dakota, United States. The midpoint of Massachusetts, United States is further east by approximately 1,475 miles (2,374km).
No, Massachusetts, United States is not further north than South Dakota, United States.
Yes, Massachusetts, United States is further south than South Dakota, United States. The midpoint of Massachusetts, United States is further south by approximately 108 miles (174km).
No, Massachusetts is smaller than South Dakota.
Massachusetts has an area of 27,336 km2 (70,800 miles2) and South Dakota has an area of 199,729 km2 (517,298 miles2)
which means that Massachusetts is 172,393 km2 (446,498 miles2) smaller than South Dakota.
That makes Massachusetts 7 times smaller than South Dakota.
Yes, Massachusetts is smaller than South Dakota.
Massachusetts has an area of 27,336 km2 (70,800 miles2) and South Dakota has an area of 199,729 km2 (517,298 miles2)
which means that Massachusetts is 172,393 km2 (446,498 miles2) smaller than South Dakota.
That makes Massachusetts 7 times smaller than South Dakota.
The midpoint of South Dakota, United States is approximately 1,434 miles (2,307km) west of Massachusetts, United States.
Yes, South Dakota, United States is further west than Massachusetts, United States. The midpoint of South Dakota, United States is further west by approximately 1,475 miles (2,374km).
No, South Dakota, United States is not further east than Massachusetts, United States.
Yes, South Dakota, United States is further north than Massachusetts, United States. The midpoint of South Dakota, United States is further north by approximately 108 miles (174km).
No, South Dakota, United States is not further south than Massachusetts, United States.
Yes, South Dakota is bigger than Massachusetts.
South Dakota has an area of 199,729 km2 (517,298 miles2) and Massachusetts has an area of 27,336 km2 (70,800 miles2)
which means that South Dakota is 172,393 km2 (446,498 miles2) bigger than Massachusetts.
That makes South Dakota 7 times bigger than Massachusetts.
No, South Dakota is not smaller than Massachusetts.
South Dakota has an area of 199,729 km2 (517,298 miles2) and Massachusetts has an area of 27,336 km2 (70,800 miles2)
which means that South Dakota is 172,393 km2 (446,498 miles2) bigger than Massachusetts.
That makes South Dakota 7 times bigger than Massachusetts.
Yes, Massachusetts is more populated than South Dakota.
Massachusetts has a population of 6,984,723 and South Dakota has a population of 895,376
which means that Massachusetts has 6,089,347 more people than South Dakota.
That makes Massachusetts 8 times more populated than South Dakota.
No, Massachusetts is not less populated than South Dakota.
Massachusetts has a population of 6,984,723 and South Dakota has a population of 895,376
which means that Massachusetts has 6,089,347 more people than South Dakota.
That makes Massachusetts 8 times more populated than South Dakota.
No, South Dakota is not more populated than Massachusetts.
South Dakota has a population of 895,376 and Massachusetts has a population of 6,984,723
which means that South Dakota has 6,089,347 fewer people than Massachusetts.
That makes South Dakota 8 times less populated than Massachusetts.
Yes, South Dakota is less populated than Massachusetts.
South Dakota has a population of 895,376 and Massachusetts has a population of 6,984,723
which means that South Dakota has 6,089,347 fewer people than Massachusetts.
That makes South Dakota 8 times less populated than Massachusetts.