On average across the year,
no, South Dakota, United States is not hotter than
Washington, D.C., United States
.
South Dakota, United States has an average temperature of 8°C/46°F and Washington, D.C., United States has an average temperature of 15°C/59°F.
South Dakota, United States's hottest month is July, with an average maximum temperature of 30°C/86°F, which is not hotter than Washington, D.C., United States's hottest month (also July, with an average maximum temperature of 32°C/90°F).
On average across the year, yes, South Dakota, United States is colder than Washington, D.C., United States . South Dakota, United States has an average minimum temperature of 1°C/34°F and Washington, D.C., United States has an average minimum temperature of 11°C/52°F.
On average across the year,
no, South Dakota, United States has less rain than
Washington, D.C., United States. South Dakota, United States has an average annual rainfall of 498mm and Washington, D.C., United States has an average annual rainfall of 1247mm.
South Dakota, United States's wettest month is May, with an average monthly rainfall of 74mm, which is drier than Washington, D.C., United States's wettest month (July, with an average monthly rainfall of 150mm).
The midpoint of South Dakota, United States is approximately 1,230 miles (1,980km) west of Washington, D.C., United States.
Yes, South Dakota, United States is further west than Washington, D.C., United States. The midpoint of South Dakota, United States is further west by approximately 1,089 miles (1,753km).
No, South Dakota, United States is not further east than Washington, D.C., United States.
Yes, South Dakota, United States is further north than Washington, D.C., United States. The midpoint of South Dakota, United States is further north by approximately 350 miles (563km).
No, South Dakota, United States is not further south than Washington, D.C., United States.
Yes, South Dakota is bigger than Washington, D.C..
South Dakota has an area of 199,729 km2 (517,298 miles2) and Washington, D.C. has an area of 177 km2 (458 miles2)
which means that South Dakota is 199,552 km2 (516,840 miles2) bigger than Washington, D.C..
That makes South Dakota 1,128 times bigger than Washington, D.C..
No, South Dakota is not smaller than Washington, D.C..
South Dakota has an area of 199,729 km2 (517,298 miles2) and Washington, D.C. has an area of 177 km2 (458 miles2)
which means that South Dakota is 199,552 km2 (516,840 miles2) bigger than Washington, D.C..
That makes South Dakota 1,128 times bigger than Washington, D.C..
The midpoint of Washington, D.C., United States is approximately 1,230 miles (1,980km) east of South Dakota, United States.
No, Washington, D.C., United States is not further west than South Dakota, United States.
Yes, Washington, D.C., United States is further east than South Dakota, United States. The midpoint of Washington, D.C., United States is further east by approximately 1,089 miles (1,753km).
No, Washington, D.C., United States is not further north than South Dakota, United States.
Yes, Washington, D.C., United States is further south than South Dakota, United States. The midpoint of Washington, D.C., United States is further south by approximately 350 miles (563km).
No, Washington, D.C. is smaller than South Dakota.
Washington, D.C. has an area of 177 km2 (458 miles2) and South Dakota has an area of 199,729 km2 (517,298 miles2)
which means that Washington, D.C. is 199,552 km2 (516,840 miles2) smaller than South Dakota.
That makes Washington, D.C. 1,128 times smaller than South Dakota.
Yes, Washington, D.C. is smaller than South Dakota.
Washington, D.C. has an area of 177 km2 (458 miles2) and South Dakota has an area of 199,729 km2 (517,298 miles2)
which means that Washington, D.C. is 199,552 km2 (516,840 miles2) smaller than South Dakota.
That makes Washington, D.C. 1,128 times smaller than South Dakota.
Yes, South Dakota is more populated than Washington, D.C..
South Dakota has a population of 895,376 and Washington, D.C. has a population of 670,050
which means that South Dakota has 225,326 more people than Washington, D.C..
That makes South Dakota 1 times more populated than Washington, D.C..
No, South Dakota is not less populated than Washington, D.C..
South Dakota has a population of 895,376 and Washington, D.C. has a population of 670,050
which means that South Dakota has 225,326 more people than Washington, D.C..
That makes South Dakota 1 times more populated than Washington, D.C..
No, Washington, D.C. is not more populated than South Dakota.
Washington, D.C. has a population of 670,050 and South Dakota has a population of 895,376
which means that Washington, D.C. has 225,326 fewer people than South Dakota.
That makes Washington, D.C. 1 times less populated than South Dakota.
Yes, Washington, D.C. is less populated than South Dakota.
Washington, D.C. has a population of 670,050 and South Dakota has a population of 895,376
which means that Washington, D.C. has 225,326 fewer people than South Dakota.
That makes Washington, D.C. 1 times less populated than South Dakota.