On average across the year,
no, Minnesota, United States is not hotter than
New Hampshire, United States
.
Minnesota, United States has an average temperature of 7°C/45°F and New Hampshire, United States has an average temperature of 9°C/48°F.
Minnesota, United States's hottest month is July, with an average maximum temperature of 28°C/82°F, which is not hotter than New Hampshire, United States's hottest month (also July, with an average maximum temperature of 29°C/84°F).
On average across the year, yes, Minnesota, United States is colder than New Hampshire, United States . Minnesota, United States has an average minimum temperature of 2°C/36°F and New Hampshire, United States has an average minimum temperature of 3°C/37°F.
On average across the year,
no, Minnesota, United States has less rain than
New Hampshire, United States. Minnesota, United States has an average annual rainfall of 821mm and New Hampshire, United States has an average annual rainfall of 1196mm.
Minnesota, United States's wettest month is May, with an average monthly rainfall of 121mm, which is drier than New Hampshire, United States's wettest month (October, with an average monthly rainfall of 130mm).
The midpoint of Minnesota, United States is approximately 1,151 miles (1,853km) west of New Hampshire, United States.
Yes, Minnesota, United States is further west than New Hampshire, United States. The midpoint of Minnesota, United States is further west by approximately 1,059 miles (1,704km).
No, Minnesota, United States is not further east than New Hampshire, United States.
Yes, Minnesota, United States is further north than New Hampshire, United States. The midpoint of Minnesota, United States is further north by approximately 244 miles (393km).
No, Minnesota, United States is not further south than New Hampshire, United States.
Yes, Minnesota is bigger than New Hampshire.
Minnesota has an area of 225,163 km2 (583,172 miles2) and New Hampshire has an area of 24,214 km2 (62,714 miles2)
which means that Minnesota is 200,949 km2 (520,458 miles2) bigger than New Hampshire.
That makes Minnesota 9 times bigger than New Hampshire.
No, Minnesota is not smaller than New Hampshire.
Minnesota has an area of 225,163 km2 (583,172 miles2) and New Hampshire has an area of 24,214 km2 (62,714 miles2)
which means that Minnesota is 200,949 km2 (520,458 miles2) bigger than New Hampshire.
That makes Minnesota 9 times bigger than New Hampshire.
The midpoint of New Hampshire, United States is approximately 1,151 miles (1,853km) east of Minnesota, United States.
No, New Hampshire, United States is not further west than Minnesota, United States.
Yes, New Hampshire, United States is further east than Minnesota, United States. The midpoint of New Hampshire, United States is further east by approximately 1,059 miles (1,704km).
No, New Hampshire, United States is not further north than Minnesota, United States.
Yes, New Hampshire, United States is further south than Minnesota, United States. The midpoint of New Hampshire, United States is further south by approximately 244 miles (393km).
No, New Hampshire is smaller than Minnesota.
New Hampshire has an area of 24,214 km2 (62,714 miles2) and Minnesota has an area of 225,163 km2 (583,172 miles2)
which means that New Hampshire is 200,949 km2 (520,458 miles2) smaller than Minnesota.
That makes New Hampshire 9 times smaller than Minnesota.
Yes, New Hampshire is smaller than Minnesota.
New Hampshire has an area of 24,214 km2 (62,714 miles2) and Minnesota has an area of 225,163 km2 (583,172 miles2)
which means that New Hampshire is 200,949 km2 (520,458 miles2) smaller than Minnesota.
That makes New Hampshire 9 times smaller than Minnesota.
Yes, Minnesota is more populated than New Hampshire.
Minnesota has a population of 5,707,390 and New Hampshire has a population of 1,388,992
which means that Minnesota has 4,318,398 more people than New Hampshire.
That makes Minnesota 4 times more populated than New Hampshire.
No, Minnesota is not less populated than New Hampshire.
Minnesota has a population of 5,707,390 and New Hampshire has a population of 1,388,992
which means that Minnesota has 4,318,398 more people than New Hampshire.
That makes Minnesota 4 times more populated than New Hampshire.
No, New Hampshire is not more populated than Minnesota.
New Hampshire has a population of 1,388,992 and Minnesota has a population of 5,707,390
which means that New Hampshire has 4,318,398 fewer people than Minnesota.
That makes New Hampshire 4 times less populated than Minnesota.
Yes, New Hampshire is less populated than Minnesota.
New Hampshire has a population of 1,388,992 and Minnesota has a population of 5,707,390
which means that New Hampshire has 4,318,398 fewer people than Minnesota.
That makes New Hampshire 4 times less populated than Minnesota.