On average across the year,
yes, Nepal is hotter than
Lancaster, California
.
Nepal has an average temperature of 20°C/68°F and Lancaster, California has an average temperature of 17°C/63°F.
Nepal's hottest month is July, with an average maximum temperature of 29°C/84°F, which is not hotter than Lancaster, California's hottest month (August, with an average maximum temperature of 33°C/91°F).
On average across the year, no, Nepal is not colder than Lancaster, California . Nepal has an average minimum temperature of 14°C/57°F and Lancaster, California has an average minimum temperature of 11°C/52°F.
The midpoint of Nepal is approximately 7,842 miles (12,620km) west of Lancaster, California.
No, Nepal is not further west than Lancaster, California.
Yes, Nepal is further east than Lancaster, California. The midpoint of Nepal is further east by approximately 12,655 miles (20,366km).
No, Nepal is not further north than Lancaster, California.
Yes, Nepal is further south than Lancaster, California. The midpoint of Nepal is further south by approximately 436 miles (701km).
The midpoint of Lancaster, California is approximately 7,842 miles (12,620km) east of Nepal.
Yes, Lancaster, California is further west than Nepal. The midpoint of Lancaster, California is further west by approximately 12,655 miles (20,366km).
No, Lancaster, California is not further east than Nepal.
Yes, Lancaster, California is further north than Nepal. The midpoint of Lancaster, California is further north by approximately 436 miles (701km).
No, Lancaster, California is not further south than Nepal.
Yes, Nepal is more populated than Lancaster.
Nepal has a population of 30,666,598 and Lancaster has a population of 161,103
which means that Nepal has 30,505,495 more people than Lancaster.
That makes Nepal 190 times more populated than Lancaster.
No, Nepal is not less populated than Lancaster.
Nepal has a population of 30,666,598 and Lancaster has a population of 161,103
which means that Nepal has 30,505,495 more people than Lancaster.
That makes Nepal 190 times more populated than Lancaster.
No, Lancaster is not more populated than Nepal.
Lancaster has a population of 161,103 and Nepal has a population of 30,666,598
which means that Lancaster has 30,505,495 fewer people than Nepal.
That makes Lancaster 190 times less populated than Nepal.
Yes, Lancaster is less populated than Nepal.
Lancaster has a population of 161,103 and Nepal has a population of 30,666,598
which means that Lancaster has 30,505,495 fewer people than Nepal.
That makes Lancaster 190 times less populated than Nepal.