On average across the year,
yes, New Hampshire, United States is hotter than
North Dakota, United States
.
New Hampshire, United States has an average temperature of 9°C/48°F and North Dakota, United States has an average temperature of 6°C/43°F.
New Hampshire, United States's hottest month is July, with an average maximum temperature of 29°C/84°F, which is approximately the same temperature as North Dakota, United States's hottest month (also July, with an average maximum temperature of 29°C/84°F).
On average across the year, no, New Hampshire, United States is not colder than North Dakota, United States . New Hampshire, United States has an average minimum temperature of 3°C/37°F and North Dakota, United States has an average minimum temperature of 0°C/32°F.
On average across the year,
yes, New Hampshire, United States has more rain than
North Dakota, United States. New Hampshire, United States has an average annual rainfall of 1196mm and North Dakota, United States has an average annual rainfall of 465mm.
New Hampshire, United States's wettest month is October, with an average monthly rainfall of 130mm, which is wetter than North Dakota, United States's wettest month (June, with an average monthly rainfall of 83mm).
The midpoint of New Hampshire, United States is approximately 1,450 miles (2,334km) east of North Dakota, United States.
No, New Hampshire, United States is not further west than North Dakota, United States.
Yes, New Hampshire, United States is further east than North Dakota, United States. The midpoint of New Hampshire, United States is further east by approximately 1,536 miles (2,472km).
No, New Hampshire, United States is not further north than North Dakota, United States.
Yes, New Hampshire, United States is further south than North Dakota, United States. The midpoint of New Hampshire, United States is further south by approximately 301 miles (485km).
No, New Hampshire is smaller than North Dakota.
New Hampshire has an area of 24,214 km2 (62,714 miles2) and North Dakota has an area of 183,108 km2 (474,250 miles2)
which means that New Hampshire is 158,894 km2 (411,535 miles2) smaller than North Dakota.
That makes New Hampshire 8 times smaller than North Dakota.
Yes, New Hampshire is smaller than North Dakota.
New Hampshire has an area of 24,214 km2 (62,714 miles2) and North Dakota has an area of 183,108 km2 (474,250 miles2)
which means that New Hampshire is 158,894 km2 (411,535 miles2) smaller than North Dakota.
That makes New Hampshire 8 times smaller than North Dakota.
The midpoint of North Dakota, United States is approximately 1,450 miles (2,334km) west of New Hampshire, United States.
Yes, North Dakota, United States is further west than New Hampshire, United States. The midpoint of North Dakota, United States is further west by approximately 1,536 miles (2,472km).
No, North Dakota, United States is not further east than New Hampshire, United States.
Yes, North Dakota, United States is further north than New Hampshire, United States. The midpoint of North Dakota, United States is further north by approximately 301 miles (485km).
No, North Dakota, United States is not further south than New Hampshire, United States.
Yes, North Dakota is bigger than New Hampshire.
North Dakota has an area of 183,108 km2 (474,250 miles2) and New Hampshire has an area of 24,214 km2 (62,714 miles2)
which means that North Dakota is 158,894 km2 (411,535 miles2) bigger than New Hampshire.
That makes North Dakota 8 times bigger than New Hampshire.
No, North Dakota is not smaller than New Hampshire.
North Dakota has an area of 183,108 km2 (474,250 miles2) and New Hampshire has an area of 24,214 km2 (62,714 miles2)
which means that North Dakota is 158,894 km2 (411,535 miles2) bigger than New Hampshire.
That makes North Dakota 8 times bigger than New Hampshire.
Yes, New Hampshire is more populated than North Dakota.
New Hampshire has a population of 1,388,992 and North Dakota has a population of 774,948
which means that New Hampshire has 614,044 more people than North Dakota.
That makes New Hampshire 2 times more populated than North Dakota.
No, New Hampshire is not less populated than North Dakota.
New Hampshire has a population of 1,388,992 and North Dakota has a population of 774,948
which means that New Hampshire has 614,044 more people than North Dakota.
That makes New Hampshire 2 times more populated than North Dakota.
No, North Dakota is not more populated than New Hampshire.
North Dakota has a population of 774,948 and New Hampshire has a population of 1,388,992
which means that North Dakota has 614,044 fewer people than New Hampshire.
That makes North Dakota 2 times less populated than New Hampshire.
Yes, North Dakota is less populated than New Hampshire.
North Dakota has a population of 774,948 and New Hampshire has a population of 1,388,992
which means that North Dakota has 614,044 fewer people than New Hampshire.
That makes North Dakota 2 times less populated than New Hampshire.