On average across the year,
yes, New Zealand is hotter than
Bismarck, North Dakota
.
New Zealand has an average temperature of 13°C/55°F and Bismarck, North Dakota has an average temperature of 7°C/45°F.
New Zealand's hottest month is January, with an average maximum temperature of 23°C/73°F, which is not hotter than Bismarck, North Dakota's hottest month (July, with an average maximum temperature of 30°C/86°F).
On average across the year, no, New Zealand is not colder than Bismarck, North Dakota . New Zealand has an average minimum temperature of 8°C/46°F and Bismarck, North Dakota has an average minimum temperature of 0°C/32°F.
On average across the year,
yes, New Zealand has more rain than
Bismarck, North Dakota. New Zealand has an average annual rainfall of 953mm and Bismarck, North Dakota has an average annual rainfall of 515mm.
New Zealand's wettest month is June, with an average monthly rainfall of 106mm, which is wetter than Bismarck, North Dakota's wettest month (also June, with an average monthly rainfall of 83mm).
The midpoint of New Zealand is approximately 7,962 miles (12,813km) south west of Bismarck, North Dakota.
No, New Zealand is not further west than Bismarck, North Dakota.
Yes, New Zealand is further east than Bismarck, North Dakota. The midpoint of New Zealand is further east by approximately 1,743 miles (2,805km).
No, New Zealand is not further north than Bismarck, North Dakota.
Yes, New Zealand is further south than Bismarck, North Dakota. The midpoint of New Zealand is further south by approximately 6,060 miles (9,752km).
The midpoint of Bismarck, North Dakota is approximately 7,962 miles (12,813km) north east of New Zealand.
Yes, Bismarck, North Dakota is further west than New Zealand. The midpoint of Bismarck, North Dakota is further west by approximately 1,743 miles (2,805km).
No, Bismarck, North Dakota is not further east than New Zealand.
Yes, Bismarck, North Dakota is further north than New Zealand. The midpoint of Bismarck, North Dakota is further north by approximately 6,060 miles (9,752km).
No, Bismarck, North Dakota is not further south than New Zealand.
Yes, New Zealand is more populated than Bismarck.
New Zealand has a population of 5,053,004 and Bismarck has a population of 71,167
which means that New Zealand has 4,981,837 more people than Bismarck.
That makes New Zealand 71 times more populated than Bismarck.
No, New Zealand is not less populated than Bismarck.
New Zealand has a population of 5,053,004 and Bismarck has a population of 71,167
which means that New Zealand has 4,981,837 more people than Bismarck.
That makes New Zealand 71 times more populated than Bismarck.
No, Bismarck is not more populated than New Zealand.
Bismarck has a population of 71,167 and New Zealand has a population of 5,053,004
which means that Bismarck has 4,981,837 fewer people than New Zealand.
That makes Bismarck 71 times less populated than New Zealand.
Yes, Bismarck is less populated than New Zealand.
Bismarck has a population of 71,167 and New Zealand has a population of 5,053,004
which means that Bismarck has 4,981,837 fewer people than New Zealand.
That makes Bismarck 71 times less populated than New Zealand.