Comparing New Zealand with Frisco, Texas

Compare Climate information for New Zealand and Frisco, Texas

Is New Zealand warmer or hotter than Frisco, Texas?

On average across the year, no, New Zealand is not hotter than Frisco, Texas . New Zealand has an average temperature of 13°C/55°F and Frisco, Texas has an average temperature of 19°C/66°F.

New Zealand's hottest month is January, with an average maximum temperature of 23°C/73°F, which is not hotter than Frisco, Texas's hottest month (July, with an average maximum temperature of 35°C/95°F).

Average Monthly Maximum Temperatures
New Zealand Frisco, Texas

Is New Zealand colder or cooler than Frisco, Texas?

On average across the year, yes, New Zealand is colder than Frisco, Texas . New Zealand has an average minimum temperature of 8°C/46°F and Frisco, Texas has an average minimum temperature of 13°C/55°F.



New Zealand's coldest month is July, with an average minimum temperature of 4°C/39°F, which is not colder than Frisco, Texas's coldest month (January, with an average minimum temperature of 1°C/34°F).

Average Monthly Minimum Temperatures
New Zealand Frisco, Texas

Does New Zealand have more rain than Frisco, Texas?

On average across the year, no, New Zealand has less rain than Frisco, Texas. New Zealand has an average annual rainfall of 953mm and Frisco, Texas has an average annual rainfall of 1103mm.

New Zealand's wettest month is June, with an average monthly rainfall of 106mm, which is drier than Frisco, Texas's wettest month (May, with an average monthly rainfall of 164mm).

Average Monthly Rainfall
New Zealand Frisco, Texas

Compare location information for New Zealand and Frisco, Texas

How far is New Zealand from Frisco, Texas?

The midpoint of New Zealand is approximately 7,588 miles (12,212km) south west of Frisco, Texas.

Is New Zealand further west than Frisco, Texas?

No, New Zealand is not further west than Frisco, Texas.

Is New Zealand further east than Frisco, Texas?

Yes, New Zealand is further east than Frisco, Texas. The midpoint of New Zealand is further east by approximately 3,931 miles (6,326km).

Is New Zealand further north than Frisco, Texas?

No, New Zealand is not further north than Frisco, Texas.

Is New Zealand further south than Frisco, Texas?

Yes, New Zealand is further south than Frisco, Texas. The midpoint of New Zealand is further south by approximately 5,116 miles (8,234km).

How far is Frisco, Texas from New Zealand?

The midpoint of Frisco, Texas is approximately 7,588 miles (12,212km) north east of New Zealand.

Is Frisco, Texas further west than New Zealand?

Yes, Frisco, Texas is further west than New Zealand. The midpoint of Frisco, Texas is further west by approximately 3,931 miles (6,326km).

Is Frisco, Texas further east than New Zealand?

No, Frisco, Texas is not further east than New Zealand.

Is Frisco, Texas further north than New Zealand?

Yes, Frisco, Texas is further north than New Zealand. The midpoint of Frisco, Texas is further north by approximately 5,116 miles (8,234km).

Is Frisco, Texas further south than New Zealand?

No, Frisco, Texas is not further south than New Zealand.

Compare population information for New Zealand and Frisco, Texas

Is New Zealand more populated than Frisco, Texas?

Yes, New Zealand is more populated than Frisco. New Zealand has a population of 5,053,004 and Frisco has a population of 154,407 which means that New Zealand has 4,898,597 more people than Frisco.
That makes New Zealand 33 times more populated than Frisco.

Is New Zealand less populated than Frisco, Texas?

No, New Zealand is not less populated than Frisco. New Zealand has a population of 5,053,004 and Frisco has a population of 154,407 which means that New Zealand has 4,898,597 more people than Frisco.
That makes New Zealand 33 times more populated than Frisco.

Is Frisco, Texas more populated than New Zealand?

No, Frisco is not more populated than New Zealand. Frisco has a population of 154,407 and New Zealand has a population of 5,053,004 which means that Frisco has 4,898,597 fewer people than New Zealand.
That makes Frisco 33 times less populated than New Zealand.

Is Frisco, Texas less populated than New Zealand?

Yes, Frisco is less populated than New Zealand. Frisco has a population of 154,407 and New Zealand has a population of 5,053,004 which means that Frisco has 4,898,597 fewer people than New Zealand.
That makes Frisco 33 times less populated than New Zealand.

Compare New Zealand with other countries
Afghanistan Aland Islands Albania Algeria American Samoa Andorra Argentina Armenia Australia Austria Azerbaijan Bahamas Bahrain Bangladesh Barbados Belarus Belgium Belize Benin Bermuda Bolivia Bosnia and Herzegovina Botswana Brazil Brunei Bulgaria Burkina Faso Cabo Verde Cambodia Cameroon Canada Cayman Islands Central African Republic Chad Chile China Colombia Costa Rica Croatia Cuba Cyprus Czechia Democratic Republic of the Congo Denmark Dominican Republic Ecuador Egypt El Salvador Estonia Ethiopia Faroe Islands Fiji Finland France French Guiana French Polynesia French Southern Territories Gabon Gambia Georgia Germany Ghana Greece Greenland Guadeloupe Guam Guatemala Guernsey Guinea Guinea-Bissau Honduras Hong Kong Hungary Iceland India Indonesia Iran Iraq Ireland Isle of Man Israel Italy Ivory Coast Jamaica Japan Jersey Jordan Kazakhstan Kenya Kiribati Kosovo Kuwait Kyrgyzstan Laos Latvia Lebanon Lesotho Liberia Libya Liechtenstein Lithuania Luxembourg Madagascar Malaysia Maldives Mali Malta Marshall Islands Mauritania Mauritius Mayotte Mexico Micronesia Moldova Monaco Mongolia Montenegro Morocco Mozambique Myanmar Namibia Nepal Netherlands Niger Nigeria North Korea North Macedonia Northern Mariana Islands Norway Oman Pakistan Palau Palestinian Territory Peru Philippines Poland Portugal Puerto Rico Qatar Republic of the Congo Reunion Romania Russia Rwanda San Marino Saudi Arabia Senegal Serbia Seychelles Slovakia Slovenia Solomon Islands South Africa South Korea Spain Sri Lanka Sudan Suriname Svalbard and Jan Mayen Sweden Switzerland Syria Taiwan Tajikistan Tanzania Thailand Togo Trinidad and Tobago Tunisia Turkey Turkmenistan Tuvalu U.S. Virgin Islands Ukraine United Arab Emirates United Kingdom United States Uruguay Uzbekistan Vanuatu Vietnam Wallis and Futuna Zimbabwe
Info for other countries
Afghanistan the Aland Islands Albania Algeria American Samoa Andorra Argentina Armenia Australia Austria Azerbaijan Bahamas Bahrain Bangladesh Barbados Belarus Belgium Belize Benin Bermuda Bolivia Bosnia and Herzegovina Botswana Brazil Brunei Bulgaria Burkina Faso Cabo Verde Cambodia Cameroon Canada the Cayman Islands Central African Republic Chad Chile China Colombia Costa Rica Croatia Cuba Cyprus Czechia Democratic Republic of the Congo Denmark Dominican Republic Ecuador Egypt El Salvador Estonia Ethiopia the Faroe Islands Fiji Finland France French Guiana French Polynesia French Southern Territories Gabon Gambia Georgia Germany Ghana Greece Greenland Guadeloupe Guam Guatemala Guernsey Guinea Guinea-Bissau Honduras Hong Kong Hungary Iceland India Indonesia Iran Iraq Ireland Isle of Man Israel Italy Ivory Coast Jamaica Japan Jersey Jordan Kazakhstan Kenya Kiribati Kosovo Kuwait Kyrgyzstan Laos Latvia Lebanon Lesotho Liberia Libya Liechtenstein Lithuania Luxembourg Madagascar Malaysia Maldives Mali Malta the Marshall Islands Mauritania Mauritius Mayotte Mexico Micronesia Moldova Monaco Mongolia Montenegro Morocco Mozambique Myanmar Namibia Nepal Netherlands Niger Nigeria North Korea North Macedonia the Northern Mariana Islands Norway Oman Pakistan Palau Palestinian Territory Peru Philippines Poland Portugal Puerto Rico Qatar Republic of the Congo Reunion Romania Russia Rwanda San Marino Saudi Arabia Senegal Serbia Seychelles Slovakia Slovenia the Solomon Islands South Africa South Korea Spain Sri Lanka Sudan Suriname Svalbard and Jan Mayen Sweden Switzerland Syria Taiwan Tajikistan Tanzania Thailand Togo Trinidad and Tobago Tunisia Turkey Turkmenistan Tuvalu the U.S. Virgin Islands Ukraine United Arab Emirates the United Kingdom the United States Uruguay Uzbekistan Vanuatu Vietnam Wallis and Futuna Zimbabwe