On average across the year,
yes, New Zealand is hotter than
Sioux Falls, South Dakota
.
New Zealand has an average temperature of 13°C/55°F and Sioux Falls, South Dakota has an average temperature of 9°C/48°F.
New Zealand's hottest month is January, with an average maximum temperature of 23°C/73°F, which is not hotter than Sioux Falls, South Dakota's hottest month (July, with an average maximum temperature of 30°C/86°F).
On average across the year, no, New Zealand is not colder than Sioux Falls, South Dakota . New Zealand has an average minimum temperature of 8°C/46°F and Sioux Falls, South Dakota has an average minimum temperature of 3°C/37°F.
On average across the year,
yes, New Zealand has more rain than
Sioux Falls, South Dakota. New Zealand has an average annual rainfall of 953mm and Sioux Falls, South Dakota has an average annual rainfall of 781mm.
New Zealand's wettest month is June, with an average monthly rainfall of 106mm, which is drier than Sioux Falls, South Dakota's wettest month (also June, with an average monthly rainfall of 119mm).
The midpoint of New Zealand is approximately 8,004 miles (12,881km) south west of Sioux Falls, South Dakota.
No, New Zealand is not further west than Sioux Falls, South Dakota.
Yes, New Zealand is further east than Sioux Falls, South Dakota. The midpoint of New Zealand is further east by approximately 2,248 miles (3,618km).
No, New Zealand is not further north than Sioux Falls, South Dakota.
Yes, New Zealand is further south than Sioux Falls, South Dakota. The midpoint of New Zealand is further south by approximately 5,835 miles (9,390km).
The midpoint of Sioux Falls, South Dakota is approximately 8,004 miles (12,881km) north east of New Zealand.
Yes, Sioux Falls, South Dakota is further west than New Zealand. The midpoint of Sioux Falls, South Dakota is further west by approximately 2,248 miles (3,618km).
No, Sioux Falls, South Dakota is not further east than New Zealand.
Yes, Sioux Falls, South Dakota is further north than New Zealand. The midpoint of Sioux Falls, South Dakota is further north by approximately 5,835 miles (9,390km).
No, Sioux Falls, South Dakota is not further south than New Zealand.
Yes, New Zealand is more populated than Sioux Falls.
New Zealand has a population of 5,053,004 and Sioux Falls has a population of 171,544
which means that New Zealand has 4,881,460 more people than Sioux Falls.
That makes New Zealand 30 times more populated than Sioux Falls.
No, New Zealand is not less populated than Sioux Falls.
New Zealand has a population of 5,053,004 and Sioux Falls has a population of 171,544
which means that New Zealand has 4,881,460 more people than Sioux Falls.
That makes New Zealand 30 times more populated than Sioux Falls.
No, Sioux Falls is not more populated than New Zealand.
Sioux Falls has a population of 171,544 and New Zealand has a population of 5,053,004
which means that Sioux Falls has 4,881,460 fewer people than New Zealand.
That makes Sioux Falls 30 times less populated than New Zealand.
Yes, Sioux Falls is less populated than New Zealand.
Sioux Falls has a population of 171,544 and New Zealand has a population of 5,053,004
which means that Sioux Falls has 4,881,460 fewer people than New Zealand.
That makes Sioux Falls 30 times less populated than New Zealand.