On average across the year,
yes, Republic of the Congo is hotter than
Bismarck, North Dakota
.
Republic of the Congo has an average temperature of 26°C/79°F and Bismarck, North Dakota has an average temperature of 7°C/45°F.
Republic of the Congo's hottest month is February, with an average maximum temperature of 32°C/90°F, which is hotter than Bismarck, North Dakota's hottest month (July, with an average maximum temperature of 30°C/86°F).
On average across the year, no, Republic of the Congo is not colder than Bismarck, North Dakota . Republic of the Congo has an average minimum temperature of 21°C/70°F and Bismarck, North Dakota has an average minimum temperature of 0°C/32°F.
On average across the year,
yes, Republic of the Congo has more rain than
Bismarck, North Dakota. Republic of the Congo has an average annual rainfall of 522mm and Bismarck, North Dakota has an average annual rainfall of 515mm.
Republic of the Congo's wettest month is November, with an average monthly rainfall of 76mm, which is drier than Bismarck, North Dakota's wettest month (June, with an average monthly rainfall of 83mm).
The midpoint of Republic of the Congo is approximately 7,464 miles (12,012km) south east of Bismarck, North Dakota.
No, Republic of the Congo is not further west than Bismarck, North Dakota.
Yes, Republic of the Congo is further east than Bismarck, North Dakota. The midpoint of Republic of the Congo is further east by approximately 7,383 miles (11,882km).
No, Republic of the Congo is not further north than Bismarck, North Dakota.
Yes, Republic of the Congo is further south than Bismarck, North Dakota. The midpoint of Republic of the Congo is further south by approximately 3,250 miles (5,230km).
The midpoint of Bismarck, North Dakota is approximately 7,464 miles (12,012km) north west of Republic of the Congo.
Yes, Bismarck, North Dakota is further west than Republic of the Congo. The midpoint of Bismarck, North Dakota is further west by approximately 7,383 miles (11,882km).
No, Bismarck, North Dakota is not further east than Republic of the Congo.
Yes, Bismarck, North Dakota is further north than Republic of the Congo. The midpoint of Bismarck, North Dakota is further north by approximately 3,250 miles (5,230km).
No, Bismarck, North Dakota is not further south than Republic of the Congo.
Yes, Republic of the Congo is more populated than Bismarck.
Republic of the Congo has a population of 5,546,307 and Bismarck has a population of 71,167
which means that Republic of the Congo has 5,475,140 more people than Bismarck.
That makes Republic of the Congo 78 times more populated than Bismarck.
No, Republic of the Congo is not less populated than Bismarck.
Republic of the Congo has a population of 5,546,307 and Bismarck has a population of 71,167
which means that Republic of the Congo has 5,475,140 more people than Bismarck.
That makes Republic of the Congo 78 times more populated than Bismarck.
No, Bismarck is not more populated than Republic of the Congo.
Bismarck has a population of 71,167 and Republic of the Congo has a population of 5,546,307
which means that Bismarck has 5,475,140 fewer people than Republic of the Congo.
That makes Bismarck 78 times less populated than Republic of the Congo.
Yes, Bismarck is less populated than Republic of the Congo.
Bismarck has a population of 71,167 and Republic of the Congo has a population of 5,546,307
which means that Bismarck has 5,475,140 fewer people than Republic of the Congo.
That makes Bismarck 78 times less populated than Republic of the Congo.