On average across the year,
yes, Rwanda is hotter than
Columbia, South Carolina
.
Rwanda has an average temperature of 22°C/72°F and Columbia, South Carolina has an average temperature of 19°C/66°F.
Rwanda's hottest month is February, with an average maximum temperature of 29°C/84°F, which is not hotter than Columbia, South Carolina's hottest month (July, with an average maximum temperature of 34°C/93°F).
On average across the year, no, Rwanda is not colder than Columbia, South Carolina . Rwanda has an average minimum temperature of 17°C/63°F and Columbia, South Carolina has an average minimum temperature of 13°C/55°F.
On average across the year,
no, Rwanda has less rain than
Columbia, South Carolina. Rwanda has an average annual rainfall of 726mm and Columbia, South Carolina has an average annual rainfall of 1330mm.
Rwanda's wettest month is April, with an average monthly rainfall of 141mm, which is drier than Columbia, South Carolina's wettest month (July, with an average monthly rainfall of 147mm).
The midpoint of Rwanda is approximately 7,486 miles (12,047km) east of Columbia, South Carolina.
No, Rwanda is not further west than Columbia, South Carolina.
Yes, Rwanda is further east than Columbia, South Carolina. The midpoint of Rwanda is further east by approximately 7,213 miles (11,608km).
No, Rwanda is not further north than Columbia, South Carolina.
Yes, Rwanda is further south than Columbia, South Carolina. The midpoint of Rwanda is further south by approximately 2,483 miles (3,996km).
The midpoint of Columbia, South Carolina is approximately 7,486 miles (12,047km) west of Rwanda.
Yes, Columbia, South Carolina is further west than Rwanda. The midpoint of Columbia, South Carolina is further west by approximately 7,213 miles (11,608km).
No, Columbia, South Carolina is not further east than Rwanda.
Yes, Columbia, South Carolina is further north than Rwanda. The midpoint of Columbia, South Carolina is further north by approximately 2,483 miles (3,996km).
No, Columbia, South Carolina is not further south than Rwanda.
Yes, Rwanda is more populated than Columbia.
Rwanda has a population of 13,173,730 and Columbia has a population of 133,803
which means that Rwanda has 13,039,927 more people than Columbia.
That makes Rwanda 99 times more populated than Columbia.
No, Rwanda is not less populated than Columbia.
Rwanda has a population of 13,173,730 and Columbia has a population of 133,803
which means that Rwanda has 13,039,927 more people than Columbia.
That makes Rwanda 99 times more populated than Columbia.
No, Columbia is not more populated than Rwanda.
Columbia has a population of 133,803 and Rwanda has a population of 13,173,730
which means that Columbia has 13,039,927 fewer people than Rwanda.
That makes Columbia 99 times less populated than Rwanda.
Yes, Columbia is less populated than Rwanda.
Columbia has a population of 133,803 and Rwanda has a population of 13,173,730
which means that Columbia has 13,039,927 fewer people than Rwanda.
That makes Columbia 99 times less populated than Rwanda.