On average across the year,
yes, Rwanda is hotter than
Lancaster, California
.
Rwanda has an average temperature of 22°C/72°F and Lancaster, California has an average temperature of 17°C/63°F.
Rwanda's hottest month is February, with an average maximum temperature of 29°C/84°F, which is not hotter than Lancaster, California's hottest month (August, with an average maximum temperature of 33°C/91°F).
On average across the year, no, Rwanda is not colder than Lancaster, California . Rwanda has an average minimum temperature of 17°C/63°F and Lancaster, California has an average minimum temperature of 11°C/52°F.
The midpoint of Rwanda is approximately 9,379 miles (15,094km) east of Lancaster, California.
No, Rwanda is not further west than Lancaster, California.
Yes, Rwanda is further east than Lancaster, California. The midpoint of Rwanda is further east by approximately 9,605 miles (15,458km).
No, Rwanda is not further north than Lancaster, California.
Yes, Rwanda is further south than Lancaster, California. The midpoint of Rwanda is further south by approximately 2,531 miles (4,074km).
The midpoint of Lancaster, California is approximately 9,379 miles (15,094km) west of Rwanda.
Yes, Lancaster, California is further west than Rwanda. The midpoint of Lancaster, California is further west by approximately 9,605 miles (15,458km).
No, Lancaster, California is not further east than Rwanda.
Yes, Lancaster, California is further north than Rwanda. The midpoint of Lancaster, California is further north by approximately 2,531 miles (4,074km).
No, Lancaster, California is not further south than Rwanda.
Yes, Rwanda is more populated than Lancaster.
Rwanda has a population of 13,173,730 and Lancaster has a population of 161,103
which means that Rwanda has 13,012,627 more people than Lancaster.
That makes Rwanda 82 times more populated than Lancaster.
No, Rwanda is not less populated than Lancaster.
Rwanda has a population of 13,173,730 and Lancaster has a population of 161,103
which means that Rwanda has 13,012,627 more people than Lancaster.
That makes Rwanda 82 times more populated than Lancaster.
No, Lancaster is not more populated than Rwanda.
Lancaster has a population of 161,103 and Rwanda has a population of 13,173,730
which means that Lancaster has 13,012,627 fewer people than Rwanda.
That makes Lancaster 82 times less populated than Rwanda.
Yes, Lancaster is less populated than Rwanda.
Lancaster has a population of 161,103 and Rwanda has a population of 13,173,730
which means that Lancaster has 13,012,627 fewer people than Rwanda.
That makes Lancaster 82 times less populated than Rwanda.