On average across the year,
yes, Rwanda is hotter than
New Hampshire, United States
.
Rwanda has an average temperature of 22°C/72°F and New Hampshire, United States has an average temperature of 9°C/48°F.
Rwanda's hottest month is February, with an average maximum temperature of 29°C/84°F, which is approximately the same temperature as New Hampshire, United States's hottest month (July, with an average maximum temperature of 29°C/84°F).
On average across the year, no, Rwanda is not colder than New Hampshire, United States . Rwanda has an average minimum temperature of 17°C/63°F and New Hampshire, United States has an average minimum temperature of 3°C/37°F.
On average across the year,
no, Rwanda has less rain than
New Hampshire, United States. Rwanda has an average annual rainfall of 726mm and New Hampshire, United States has an average annual rainfall of 1196mm.
Rwanda's wettest month is April, with an average monthly rainfall of 141mm, which is wetter than New Hampshire, United States's wettest month (October, with an average monthly rainfall of 130mm).
The midpoint of Rwanda is approximately 6,885 miles (11,081km) south east of New Hampshire, United States.
No, Rwanda is not further west than New Hampshire, United States.
Yes, Rwanda is further east than New Hampshire, United States. The midpoint of Rwanda is further east by approximately 6,385 miles (10,276km).
No, Rwanda is not further north than New Hampshire, United States.
Yes, Rwanda is further south than New Hampshire, United States. The midpoint of Rwanda is further south by approximately 3,118 miles (5,018km).
Yes, Rwanda is bigger than New Hampshire.
Rwanda has an area of 24,668 km2 (63,890 miles2) and New Hampshire has an area of 24,214 km2 (62,714 miles2)
which means that Rwanda is 454 km2 (1,176 miles2) bigger than New Hampshire.
That makes Rwanda 1 times bigger than New Hampshire.
No, Rwanda is not smaller than New Hampshire.
Rwanda has an area of 24,668 km2 (63,890 miles2) and New Hampshire has an area of 24,214 km2 (62,714 miles2)
which means that Rwanda is 454 km2 (1,176 miles2) bigger than New Hampshire.
That makes Rwanda 1 times bigger than New Hampshire.
The midpoint of New Hampshire, United States is approximately 6,885 miles (11,081km) north west of Rwanda.
Yes, New Hampshire, United States is further west than Rwanda. The midpoint of New Hampshire, United States is further west by approximately 6,385 miles (10,276km).
No, New Hampshire, United States is not further east than Rwanda.
Yes, New Hampshire, United States is further north than Rwanda. The midpoint of New Hampshire, United States is further north by approximately 3,118 miles (5,018km).
No, New Hampshire, United States is not further south than Rwanda.
No, New Hampshire is smaller than Rwanda.
New Hampshire has an area of 24,214 km2 (62,714 miles2) and Rwanda has an area of 24,668 km2 (63,890 miles2)
which means that New Hampshire is 454 km2 (1,176 miles2) smaller than Rwanda.
That makes New Hampshire 1 times smaller than Rwanda.
Yes, New Hampshire is smaller than Rwanda.
New Hampshire has an area of 24,214 km2 (62,714 miles2) and Rwanda has an area of 24,668 km2 (63,890 miles2)
which means that New Hampshire is 454 km2 (1,176 miles2) smaller than Rwanda.
That makes New Hampshire 1 times smaller than Rwanda.
Yes, Rwanda is more populated than New Hampshire.
Rwanda has a population of 13,173,730 and New Hampshire has a population of 1,388,992
which means that Rwanda has 11,784,738 more people than New Hampshire.
That makes Rwanda 10 times more populated than New Hampshire.
No, Rwanda is not less populated than New Hampshire.
Rwanda has a population of 13,173,730 and New Hampshire has a population of 1,388,992
which means that Rwanda has 11,784,738 more people than New Hampshire.
That makes Rwanda 10 times more populated than New Hampshire.
No, New Hampshire is not more populated than Rwanda.
New Hampshire has a population of 1,388,992 and Rwanda has a population of 13,173,730
which means that New Hampshire has 11,784,738 fewer people than Rwanda.
That makes New Hampshire 10 times less populated than Rwanda.
Yes, New Hampshire is less populated than Rwanda.
New Hampshire has a population of 1,388,992 and Rwanda has a population of 13,173,730
which means that New Hampshire has 11,784,738 fewer people than Rwanda.
That makes New Hampshire 10 times less populated than Rwanda.