On average across the year,
yes, Rwanda is hotter than
Sioux Falls, South Dakota
.
Rwanda has an average temperature of 22°C/72°F and Sioux Falls, South Dakota has an average temperature of 9°C/48°F.
Rwanda's hottest month is February, with an average maximum temperature of 29°C/84°F, which is not hotter than Sioux Falls, South Dakota's hottest month (July, with an average maximum temperature of 30°C/86°F).
On average across the year, no, Rwanda is not colder than Sioux Falls, South Dakota . Rwanda has an average minimum temperature of 17°C/63°F and Sioux Falls, South Dakota has an average minimum temperature of 3°C/37°F.
On average across the year,
no, Rwanda has less rain than
Sioux Falls, South Dakota. Rwanda has an average annual rainfall of 726mm and Sioux Falls, South Dakota has an average annual rainfall of 781mm.
Rwanda's wettest month is April, with an average monthly rainfall of 141mm, which is wetter than Sioux Falls, South Dakota's wettest month (June, with an average monthly rainfall of 119mm).
The midpoint of Rwanda is approximately 8,088 miles (13,017km) east of Sioux Falls, South Dakota.
No, Rwanda is not further west than Sioux Falls, South Dakota.
Yes, Rwanda is further east than Sioux Falls, South Dakota. The midpoint of Rwanda is further east by approximately 7,955 miles (12,802km).
No, Rwanda is not further north than Sioux Falls, South Dakota.
Yes, Rwanda is further south than Sioux Falls, South Dakota. The midpoint of Rwanda is further south by approximately 3,143 miles (5,058km).
The midpoint of Sioux Falls, South Dakota is approximately 8,088 miles (13,017km) west of Rwanda.
Yes, Sioux Falls, South Dakota is further west than Rwanda. The midpoint of Sioux Falls, South Dakota is further west by approximately 7,955 miles (12,802km).
No, Sioux Falls, South Dakota is not further east than Rwanda.
Yes, Sioux Falls, South Dakota is further north than Rwanda. The midpoint of Sioux Falls, South Dakota is further north by approximately 3,143 miles (5,058km).
No, Sioux Falls, South Dakota is not further south than Rwanda.
Yes, Rwanda is more populated than Sioux Falls.
Rwanda has a population of 13,173,730 and Sioux Falls has a population of 171,544
which means that Rwanda has 13,002,186 more people than Sioux Falls.
That makes Rwanda 77 times more populated than Sioux Falls.
No, Rwanda is not less populated than Sioux Falls.
Rwanda has a population of 13,173,730 and Sioux Falls has a population of 171,544
which means that Rwanda has 13,002,186 more people than Sioux Falls.
That makes Rwanda 77 times more populated than Sioux Falls.
No, Sioux Falls is not more populated than Rwanda.
Sioux Falls has a population of 171,544 and Rwanda has a population of 13,173,730
which means that Sioux Falls has 13,002,186 fewer people than Rwanda.
That makes Sioux Falls 77 times less populated than Rwanda.
Yes, Sioux Falls is less populated than Rwanda.
Sioux Falls has a population of 171,544 and Rwanda has a population of 13,173,730
which means that Sioux Falls has 13,002,186 fewer people than Rwanda.
That makes Sioux Falls 77 times less populated than Rwanda.