On average across the year,
yes, Rwanda is hotter than
South Dakota, United States
.
Rwanda has an average temperature of 22°C/72°F and South Dakota, United States has an average temperature of 8°C/46°F.
Rwanda's hottest month is February, with an average maximum temperature of 29°C/84°F, which is not hotter than South Dakota, United States's hottest month (July, with an average maximum temperature of 30°C/86°F).
On average across the year, no, Rwanda is not colder than South Dakota, United States . Rwanda has an average minimum temperature of 17°C/63°F and South Dakota, United States has an average minimum temperature of 1°C/34°F.
On average across the year,
yes, Rwanda has more rain than
South Dakota, United States. Rwanda has an average annual rainfall of 726mm and South Dakota, United States has an average annual rainfall of 498mm.
Rwanda's wettest month is April, with an average monthly rainfall of 141mm, which is wetter than South Dakota, United States's wettest month (May, with an average monthly rainfall of 74mm).
The midpoint of Rwanda is approximately 8,217 miles (13,224km) east of South Dakota, United States.
No, Rwanda is not further west than South Dakota, United States.
Yes, Rwanda is further east than South Dakota, United States. The midpoint of Rwanda is further east by approximately 8,143 miles (13,105km).
No, Rwanda is not further north than South Dakota, United States.
Yes, Rwanda is further south than South Dakota, United States. The midpoint of Rwanda is further south by approximately 3,172 miles (5,105km).
No, Rwanda is smaller than South Dakota.
Rwanda has an area of 24,668 km2 (63,890 miles2) and South Dakota has an area of 199,729 km2 (517,298 miles2)
which means that Rwanda is 175,061 km2 (453,408 miles2) smaller than South Dakota.
That makes Rwanda 8 times smaller than South Dakota.
Yes, Rwanda is smaller than South Dakota.
Rwanda has an area of 24,668 km2 (63,890 miles2) and South Dakota has an area of 199,729 km2 (517,298 miles2)
which means that Rwanda is 175,061 km2 (453,408 miles2) smaller than South Dakota.
That makes Rwanda 8 times smaller than South Dakota.
The midpoint of South Dakota, United States is approximately 8,217 miles (13,224km) west of Rwanda.
Yes, South Dakota, United States is further west than Rwanda. The midpoint of South Dakota, United States is further west by approximately 8,143 miles (13,105km).
No, South Dakota, United States is not further east than Rwanda.
Yes, South Dakota, United States is further north than Rwanda. The midpoint of South Dakota, United States is further north by approximately 3,172 miles (5,105km).
No, South Dakota, United States is not further south than Rwanda.
Yes, South Dakota is bigger than Rwanda.
South Dakota has an area of 199,729 km2 (517,298 miles2) and Rwanda has an area of 24,668 km2 (63,890 miles2)
which means that South Dakota is 175,061 km2 (453,408 miles2) bigger than Rwanda.
That makes South Dakota 8 times bigger than Rwanda.
No, South Dakota is not smaller than Rwanda.
South Dakota has an area of 199,729 km2 (517,298 miles2) and Rwanda has an area of 24,668 km2 (63,890 miles2)
which means that South Dakota is 175,061 km2 (453,408 miles2) bigger than Rwanda.
That makes South Dakota 8 times bigger than Rwanda.
Yes, Rwanda is more populated than South Dakota.
Rwanda has a population of 13,173,730 and South Dakota has a population of 895,376
which means that Rwanda has 12,278,354 more people than South Dakota.
That makes Rwanda 15 times more populated than South Dakota.
No, Rwanda is not less populated than South Dakota.
Rwanda has a population of 13,173,730 and South Dakota has a population of 895,376
which means that Rwanda has 12,278,354 more people than South Dakota.
That makes Rwanda 15 times more populated than South Dakota.
No, South Dakota is not more populated than Rwanda.
South Dakota has a population of 895,376 and Rwanda has a population of 13,173,730
which means that South Dakota has 12,278,354 fewer people than Rwanda.
That makes South Dakota 15 times less populated than Rwanda.
Yes, South Dakota is less populated than Rwanda.
South Dakota has a population of 895,376 and Rwanda has a population of 13,173,730
which means that South Dakota has 12,278,354 fewer people than Rwanda.
That makes South Dakota 15 times less populated than Rwanda.