On average across the year,
yes, South Africa is hotter than
Bismarck, North Dakota
.
South Africa has an average temperature of 19°C/66°F and Bismarck, North Dakota has an average temperature of 7°C/45°F.
South Africa's hottest month is January, with an average maximum temperature of 30°C/86°F, which is approximately the same temperature as Bismarck, North Dakota's hottest month (July, with an average maximum temperature of 30°C/86°F).
On average across the year, no, South Africa is not colder than Bismarck, North Dakota . South Africa has an average minimum temperature of 12°C/54°F and Bismarck, North Dakota has an average minimum temperature of 0°C/32°F.
On average across the year,
no, South Africa has less rain than
Bismarck, North Dakota. South Africa has an average annual rainfall of 446mm and Bismarck, North Dakota has an average annual rainfall of 515mm.
South Africa's wettest month is December, with an average monthly rainfall of 70mm, which is drier than Bismarck, North Dakota's wettest month (June, with an average monthly rainfall of 83mm).
The midpoint of South Africa is approximately 9,276 miles (14,929km) south east of Bismarck, North Dakota.
No, South Africa is not further west than Bismarck, North Dakota.
Yes, South Africa is further east than Bismarck, North Dakota. The midpoint of South Africa is further east by approximately 3,033 miles (4,881km).
No, South Africa is not further north than Bismarck, North Dakota.
Yes, South Africa is further south than Bismarck, North Dakota. The midpoint of South Africa is further south by approximately 5,346 miles (8,603km).
The midpoint of Bismarck, North Dakota is approximately 9,276 miles (14,929km) north west of South Africa.
Yes, Bismarck, North Dakota is further west than South Africa. The midpoint of Bismarck, North Dakota is further west by approximately 3,033 miles (4,881km).
No, Bismarck, North Dakota is not further east than South Africa.
Yes, Bismarck, North Dakota is further north than South Africa. The midpoint of Bismarck, North Dakota is further north by approximately 5,346 miles (8,603km).
No, Bismarck, North Dakota is not further south than South Africa.
Yes, South Africa is more populated than Bismarck.
South Africa has a population of 57,516,665 and Bismarck has a population of 71,167
which means that South Africa has 57,445,498 more people than Bismarck.
That makes South Africa 808 times more populated than Bismarck.
No, South Africa is not less populated than Bismarck.
South Africa has a population of 57,516,665 and Bismarck has a population of 71,167
which means that South Africa has 57,445,498 more people than Bismarck.
That makes South Africa 808 times more populated than Bismarck.
No, Bismarck is not more populated than South Africa.
Bismarck has a population of 71,167 and South Africa has a population of 57,516,665
which means that Bismarck has 57,445,498 fewer people than South Africa.
That makes Bismarck 808 times less populated than South Africa.
Yes, Bismarck is less populated than South Africa.
Bismarck has a population of 71,167 and South Africa has a population of 57,516,665
which means that Bismarck has 57,445,498 fewer people than South Africa.
That makes Bismarck 808 times less populated than South Africa.