On average across the year,
yes, South Africa is hotter than
Lancaster, California
.
South Africa has an average temperature of 19°C/66°F and Lancaster, California has an average temperature of 17°C/63°F.
South Africa's hottest month is January, with an average maximum temperature of 30°C/86°F, which is not hotter than Lancaster, California's hottest month (August, with an average maximum temperature of 33°C/91°F).
On average across the year, no, South Africa is not colder than Lancaster, California . South Africa has an average minimum temperature of 12°C/54°F and Lancaster, California has an average minimum temperature of 11°C/52°F.
The midpoint of South Africa is approximately 10,168 miles (16,364km) south east of Lancaster, California.
No, South Africa is not further west than Lancaster, California.
Yes, South Africa is further east than Lancaster, California. The midpoint of South Africa is further east by approximately 4,402 miles (7,084km).
No, South Africa is not further north than Lancaster, California.
Yes, South Africa is further south than Lancaster, California. The midpoint of South Africa is further south by approximately 4,509 miles (7,256km).
The midpoint of Lancaster, California is approximately 10,168 miles (16,364km) north west of South Africa.
Yes, Lancaster, California is further west than South Africa. The midpoint of Lancaster, California is further west by approximately 4,402 miles (7,084km).
No, Lancaster, California is not further east than South Africa.
Yes, Lancaster, California is further north than South Africa. The midpoint of Lancaster, California is further north by approximately 4,509 miles (7,256km).
No, Lancaster, California is not further south than South Africa.
Yes, South Africa is more populated than Lancaster.
South Africa has a population of 57,516,665 and Lancaster has a population of 161,103
which means that South Africa has 57,355,562 more people than Lancaster.
That makes South Africa 357 times more populated than Lancaster.
No, South Africa is not less populated than Lancaster.
South Africa has a population of 57,516,665 and Lancaster has a population of 161,103
which means that South Africa has 57,355,562 more people than Lancaster.
That makes South Africa 357 times more populated than Lancaster.
No, Lancaster is not more populated than South Africa.
Lancaster has a population of 161,103 and South Africa has a population of 57,516,665
which means that Lancaster has 57,355,562 fewer people than South Africa.
That makes Lancaster 357 times less populated than South Africa.
Yes, Lancaster is less populated than South Africa.
Lancaster has a population of 161,103 and South Africa has a population of 57,516,665
which means that Lancaster has 57,355,562 fewer people than South Africa.
That makes Lancaster 357 times less populated than South Africa.