On average across the year,
yes, South Africa is hotter than
Lubbock, Texas
.
South Africa has an average temperature of 19°C/66°F and Lubbock, Texas has an average temperature of 17°C/63°F.
South Africa's hottest month is January, with an average maximum temperature of 30°C/86°F, which is not hotter than Lubbock, Texas's hottest month (July, with an average maximum temperature of 35°C/95°F).
On average across the year, no, South Africa is not colder than Lubbock, Texas . South Africa has an average minimum temperature of 12°C/54°F and Lubbock, Texas has an average minimum temperature of 9°C/48°F.
On average across the year,
no, South Africa has less rain than
Lubbock, Texas. South Africa has an average annual rainfall of 446mm and Lubbock, Texas has an average annual rainfall of 479mm.
South Africa's wettest month is December, with an average monthly rainfall of 70mm, which is drier than Lubbock, Texas's wettest month (May, with an average monthly rainfall of 95mm).
The midpoint of South Africa is approximately 9,236 miles (14,864km) south east of Lubbock, Texas.
No, South Africa is not further west than Lubbock, Texas.
Yes, South Africa is further east than Lubbock, Texas. The midpoint of South Africa is further east by approximately 3,969 miles (6,387km).
No, South Africa is not further north than Lubbock, Texas.
Yes, South Africa is further south than Lubbock, Texas. The midpoint of South Africa is further south by approximately 4,431 miles (7,131km).
The midpoint of Lubbock, Texas is approximately 9,236 miles (14,864km) north west of South Africa.
Yes, Lubbock, Texas is further west than South Africa. The midpoint of Lubbock, Texas is further west by approximately 3,969 miles (6,387km).
No, Lubbock, Texas is not further east than South Africa.
Yes, Lubbock, Texas is further north than South Africa. The midpoint of Lubbock, Texas is further north by approximately 4,431 miles (7,131km).
No, Lubbock, Texas is not further south than South Africa.
Yes, South Africa is more populated than Lubbock.
South Africa has a population of 57,516,665 and Lubbock has a population of 249,042
which means that South Africa has 57,267,623 more people than Lubbock.
That makes South Africa 231 times more populated than Lubbock.
No, South Africa is not less populated than Lubbock.
South Africa has a population of 57,516,665 and Lubbock has a population of 249,042
which means that South Africa has 57,267,623 more people than Lubbock.
That makes South Africa 231 times more populated than Lubbock.
No, Lubbock is not more populated than South Africa.
Lubbock has a population of 249,042 and South Africa has a population of 57,516,665
which means that Lubbock has 57,267,623 fewer people than South Africa.
That makes Lubbock 231 times less populated than South Africa.
Yes, Lubbock is less populated than South Africa.
Lubbock has a population of 249,042 and South Africa has a population of 57,516,665
which means that Lubbock has 57,267,623 fewer people than South Africa.
That makes Lubbock 231 times less populated than South Africa.