On average across the year,
no, South Africa is not hotter than
Rancho Cucamonga, California
.
South Africa has an average temperature of 19°C/66°F and Rancho Cucamonga, California has an average temperature of 20°C/68°F.
South Africa's hottest month is January, with an average maximum temperature of 30°C/86°F, which is not hotter than Rancho Cucamonga, California's hottest month (August, with an average maximum temperature of 35°C/95°F).
On average across the year, yes, South Africa is colder than Rancho Cucamonga, California . South Africa has an average minimum temperature of 12°C/54°F and Rancho Cucamonga, California has an average minimum temperature of 13°C/55°F.
On average across the year,
yes, South Africa has more rain than
Rancho Cucamonga, California. South Africa has an average annual rainfall of 446mm and Rancho Cucamonga, California has an average annual rainfall of 280mm.
South Africa's wettest month is December, with an average monthly rainfall of 70mm, which is the same as Rancho Cucamonga, California's wettest month (also December, with an average monthly rainfall of 70mm).
The midpoint of South Africa is approximately 10,134 miles (16,309km) south east of Rancho Cucamonga, California.
No, South Africa is not further west than Rancho Cucamonga, California.
Yes, South Africa is further east than Rancho Cucamonga, California. The midpoint of South Africa is further east by approximately 4,429 miles (7,128km).
No, South Africa is not further north than Rancho Cucamonga, California.
Yes, South Africa is further south than Rancho Cucamonga, California. The midpoint of South Africa is further south by approximately 4,468 miles (7,190km).
The midpoint of Rancho Cucamonga, California is approximately 10,134 miles (16,309km) north west of South Africa.
Yes, Rancho Cucamonga, California is further west than South Africa. The midpoint of Rancho Cucamonga, California is further west by approximately 4,429 miles (7,128km).
No, Rancho Cucamonga, California is not further east than South Africa.
Yes, Rancho Cucamonga, California is further north than South Africa. The midpoint of Rancho Cucamonga, California is further north by approximately 4,468 miles (7,190km).
No, Rancho Cucamonga, California is not further south than South Africa.
Yes, South Africa is more populated than Rancho Cucamonga.
South Africa has a population of 57,516,665 and Rancho Cucamonga has a population of 175,236
which means that South Africa has 57,341,429 more people than Rancho Cucamonga.
That makes South Africa 328 times more populated than Rancho Cucamonga.
No, South Africa is not less populated than Rancho Cucamonga.
South Africa has a population of 57,516,665 and Rancho Cucamonga has a population of 175,236
which means that South Africa has 57,341,429 more people than Rancho Cucamonga.
That makes South Africa 328 times more populated than Rancho Cucamonga.
No, Rancho Cucamonga is not more populated than South Africa.
Rancho Cucamonga has a population of 175,236 and South Africa has a population of 57,516,665
which means that Rancho Cucamonga has 57,341,429 fewer people than South Africa.
That makes Rancho Cucamonga 328 times less populated than South Africa.
Yes, Rancho Cucamonga is less populated than South Africa.
Rancho Cucamonga has a population of 175,236 and South Africa has a population of 57,516,665
which means that Rancho Cucamonga has 57,341,429 fewer people than South Africa.
That makes Rancho Cucamonga 328 times less populated than South Africa.