On average across the year,
yes, South Africa is hotter than
Rochester, Minnesota
.
South Africa has an average temperature of 19°C/66°F and Rochester, Minnesota has an average temperature of 7°C/45°F.
South Africa's hottest month is January, with an average maximum temperature of 30°C/86°F, which is hotter than Rochester, Minnesota's hottest month (July, with an average maximum temperature of 27°C/81°F).
On average across the year, no, South Africa is not colder than Rochester, Minnesota . South Africa has an average minimum temperature of 12°C/54°F and Rochester, Minnesota has an average minimum temperature of 3°C/37°F.
On average across the year,
no, South Africa has less rain than
Rochester, Minnesota. South Africa has an average annual rainfall of 446mm and Rochester, Minnesota has an average annual rainfall of 992mm.
South Africa's wettest month is December, with an average monthly rainfall of 70mm, which is drier than Rochester, Minnesota's wettest month (May, with an average monthly rainfall of 151mm).
The midpoint of South Africa is approximately 8,861 miles (14,260km) south east of Rochester, Minnesota.
No, South Africa is not further west than Rochester, Minnesota.
Yes, South Africa is further east than Rochester, Minnesota. The midpoint of South Africa is further east by approximately 3,010 miles (4,844km).
No, South Africa is not further north than Rochester, Minnesota.
Yes, South Africa is further south than Rochester, Minnesota. The midpoint of South Africa is further south by approximately 5,153 miles (8,293km).
The midpoint of Rochester, Minnesota is approximately 8,861 miles (14,260km) north west of South Africa.
Yes, Rochester, Minnesota is further west than South Africa. The midpoint of Rochester, Minnesota is further west by approximately 3,010 miles (4,844km).
No, Rochester, Minnesota is not further east than South Africa.
Yes, Rochester, Minnesota is further north than South Africa. The midpoint of Rochester, Minnesota is further north by approximately 5,153 miles (8,293km).
No, Rochester, Minnesota is not further south than South Africa.
Yes, South Africa is more populated than Rochester.
South Africa has a population of 57,516,665 and Rochester has a population of 112,225
which means that South Africa has 57,404,440 more people than Rochester.
That makes South Africa 513 times more populated than Rochester.
No, South Africa is not less populated than Rochester.
South Africa has a population of 57,516,665 and Rochester has a population of 112,225
which means that South Africa has 57,404,440 more people than Rochester.
That makes South Africa 513 times more populated than Rochester.
No, Rochester is not more populated than South Africa.
Rochester has a population of 112,225 and South Africa has a population of 57,516,665
which means that Rochester has 57,404,440 fewer people than South Africa.
That makes Rochester 513 times less populated than South Africa.
Yes, Rochester is less populated than South Africa.
Rochester has a population of 112,225 and South Africa has a population of 57,516,665
which means that Rochester has 57,404,440 fewer people than South Africa.
That makes Rochester 513 times less populated than South Africa.