On average across the year,
yes, South Africa is hotter than
Rutland, Vermont
.
South Africa has an average temperature of 19°C/66°F and Rutland, Vermont has an average temperature of 7°C/45°F.
South Africa's hottest month is January, with an average maximum temperature of 30°C/86°F, which is hotter than Rutland, Vermont's hottest month (July, with an average maximum temperature of 27°C/81°F).
On average across the year, no, South Africa is not colder than Rutland, Vermont . South Africa has an average minimum temperature of 12°C/54°F and Rutland, Vermont has an average minimum temperature of 1°C/34°F.
On average across the year,
no, South Africa has less rain than
Rutland, Vermont. South Africa has an average annual rainfall of 446mm and Rutland, Vermont has an average annual rainfall of 1070mm.
South Africa's wettest month is December, with an average monthly rainfall of 70mm, which is drier than Rutland, Vermont's wettest month (June, with an average monthly rainfall of 118mm).
The midpoint of South Africa is approximately 7,912 miles (12,733km) south east of Rutland, Vermont.
No, South Africa is not further west than Rutland, Vermont.
Yes, South Africa is further east than Rutland, Vermont. The midpoint of South Africa is further east by approximately 2,523 miles (4,060km).
No, South Africa is not further north than Rutland, Vermont.
Yes, South Africa is further south than Rutland, Vermont. The midpoint of South Africa is further south by approximately 5,124 miles (8,247km).
The midpoint of Rutland, Vermont is approximately 7,912 miles (12,733km) north west of South Africa.
Yes, Rutland, Vermont is further west than South Africa. The midpoint of Rutland, Vermont is further west by approximately 2,523 miles (4,060km).
No, Rutland, Vermont is not further east than South Africa.
Yes, Rutland, Vermont is further north than South Africa. The midpoint of Rutland, Vermont is further north by approximately 5,124 miles (8,247km).
No, Rutland, Vermont is not further south than South Africa.
Yes, South Africa is more populated than Rutland.
South Africa has a population of 57,516,665 and Rutland has a population of 15,824
which means that South Africa has 57,500,841 more people than Rutland.
That makes South Africa 3,635 times more populated than Rutland.
No, South Africa is not less populated than Rutland.
South Africa has a population of 57,516,665 and Rutland has a population of 15,824
which means that South Africa has 57,500,841 more people than Rutland.
That makes South Africa 3,635 times more populated than Rutland.
No, Rutland is not more populated than South Africa.
Rutland has a population of 15,824 and South Africa has a population of 57,516,665
which means that Rutland has 57,500,841 fewer people than South Africa.
That makes Rutland 3,635 times less populated than South Africa.
Yes, Rutland is less populated than South Africa.
Rutland has a population of 15,824 and South Africa has a population of 57,516,665
which means that Rutland has 57,500,841 fewer people than South Africa.
That makes Rutland 3,635 times less populated than South Africa.