On average across the year,
yes, Sri Lanka is hotter than
Bakersfield, California
.
Sri Lanka has an average temperature of 26°C/79°F and Bakersfield, California has an average temperature of 20°C/68°F.
Sri Lanka's hottest month is April, with an average maximum temperature of 31°C/88°F, which is not hotter than Bakersfield, California's hottest month (July, with an average maximum temperature of 38°C/100°F).
On average across the year, no, Sri Lanka is not colder than Bakersfield, California . Sri Lanka has an average minimum temperature of 22°C/72°F and Bakersfield, California has an average minimum temperature of 13°C/55°F.
On average across the year,
yes, Sri Lanka has more rain than
Bakersfield, California. Sri Lanka has an average annual rainfall of 1648mm and Bakersfield, California has an average annual rainfall of 150mm.
Sri Lanka's wettest month is November, with an average monthly rainfall of 254mm, which is wetter than Bakersfield, California's wettest month (March, with an average monthly rainfall of 30mm).
The midpoint of Sri Lanka is approximately 9,183 miles (14,778km) west of Bakersfield, California.
No, Sri Lanka is not further west than Bakersfield, California.
Yes, Sri Lanka is further east than Bakersfield, California. The midpoint of Sri Lanka is further east by approximately 13,747 miles (22,124km).
No, Sri Lanka is not further north than Bakersfield, California.
Yes, Sri Lanka is further south than Bakersfield, California. The midpoint of Sri Lanka is further south by approximately 1,900 miles (3,058km).
The midpoint of Bakersfield, California is approximately 9,183 miles (14,778km) east of Sri Lanka.
Yes, Bakersfield, California is further west than Sri Lanka. The midpoint of Bakersfield, California is further west by approximately 13,747 miles (22,124km).
No, Bakersfield, California is not further east than Sri Lanka.
Yes, Bakersfield, California is further north than Sri Lanka. The midpoint of Bakersfield, California is further north by approximately 1,900 miles (3,058km).
No, Bakersfield, California is not further south than Sri Lanka.
Yes, Sri Lanka is more populated than Bakersfield.
Sri Lanka has a population of 23,187,516 and Bakersfield has a population of 373,640
which means that Sri Lanka has 22,813,876 more people than Bakersfield.
That makes Sri Lanka 62 times more populated than Bakersfield.
No, Sri Lanka is not less populated than Bakersfield.
Sri Lanka has a population of 23,187,516 and Bakersfield has a population of 373,640
which means that Sri Lanka has 22,813,876 more people than Bakersfield.
That makes Sri Lanka 62 times more populated than Bakersfield.
No, Bakersfield is not more populated than Sri Lanka.
Bakersfield has a population of 373,640 and Sri Lanka has a population of 23,187,516
which means that Bakersfield has 22,813,876 fewer people than Sri Lanka.
That makes Bakersfield 62 times less populated than Sri Lanka.
Yes, Bakersfield is less populated than Sri Lanka.
Bakersfield has a population of 373,640 and Sri Lanka has a population of 23,187,516
which means that Bakersfield has 22,813,876 fewer people than Sri Lanka.
That makes Bakersfield 62 times less populated than Sri Lanka.