On average across the year,
yes, Sri Lanka is hotter than
Burbank, California
.
Sri Lanka has an average temperature of 26°C/79°F and Burbank, California has an average temperature of 19°C/66°F.
Sri Lanka's hottest month is April, with an average maximum temperature of 31°C/88°F, which is hotter than Burbank, California's hottest month (August, with an average maximum temperature of 29°C/84°F).
On average across the year, no, Sri Lanka is not colder than Burbank, California . Sri Lanka has an average minimum temperature of 22°C/72°F and Burbank, California has an average minimum temperature of 14°C/57°F.
On average across the year,
yes, Sri Lanka has more rain than
Burbank, California. Sri Lanka has an average annual rainfall of 1648mm and Burbank, California has an average annual rainfall of 306mm.
Sri Lanka's wettest month is November, with an average monthly rainfall of 254mm, which is wetter than Burbank, California's wettest month (December, with an average monthly rainfall of 78mm).
The midpoint of Sri Lanka is approximately 9,274 miles (14,925km) west of Burbank, California.
No, Sri Lanka is not further west than Burbank, California.
Yes, Sri Lanka is further east than Burbank, California. The midpoint of Sri Lanka is further east by approximately 13,712 miles (22,067km).
No, Sri Lanka is not further north than Burbank, California.
Yes, Sri Lanka is further south than Burbank, California. The midpoint of Sri Lanka is further south by approximately 1,818 miles (2,925km).
The midpoint of Burbank, California is approximately 9,274 miles (14,925km) east of Sri Lanka.
Yes, Burbank, California is further west than Sri Lanka. The midpoint of Burbank, California is further west by approximately 13,712 miles (22,067km).
No, Burbank, California is not further east than Sri Lanka.
Yes, Burbank, California is further north than Sri Lanka. The midpoint of Burbank, California is further north by approximately 1,818 miles (2,925km).
No, Burbank, California is not further south than Sri Lanka.
Yes, Sri Lanka is more populated than Burbank.
Sri Lanka has a population of 23,187,516 and Burbank has a population of 105,319
which means that Sri Lanka has 23,082,197 more people than Burbank.
That makes Sri Lanka 220 times more populated than Burbank.
No, Sri Lanka is not less populated than Burbank.
Sri Lanka has a population of 23,187,516 and Burbank has a population of 105,319
which means that Sri Lanka has 23,082,197 more people than Burbank.
That makes Sri Lanka 220 times more populated than Burbank.
No, Burbank is not more populated than Sri Lanka.
Burbank has a population of 105,319 and Sri Lanka has a population of 23,187,516
which means that Burbank has 23,082,197 fewer people than Sri Lanka.
That makes Burbank 220 times less populated than Sri Lanka.
Yes, Burbank is less populated than Sri Lanka.
Burbank has a population of 105,319 and Sri Lanka has a population of 23,187,516
which means that Burbank has 23,082,197 fewer people than Sri Lanka.
That makes Burbank 220 times less populated than Sri Lanka.