On average across the year,
yes, Sri Lanka is hotter than
Lancaster, California
.
Sri Lanka has an average temperature of 26°C/79°F and Lancaster, California has an average temperature of 17°C/63°F.
Sri Lanka's hottest month is April, with an average maximum temperature of 31°C/88°F, which is not hotter than Lancaster, California's hottest month (August, with an average maximum temperature of 33°C/91°F).
On average across the year, no, Sri Lanka is not colder than Lancaster, California . Sri Lanka has an average minimum temperature of 22°C/72°F and Lancaster, California has an average minimum temperature of 11°C/52°F.
The midpoint of Sri Lanka is approximately 9,247 miles (14,881km) west of Lancaster, California.
No, Sri Lanka is not further west than Lancaster, California.
Yes, Sri Lanka is further east than Lancaster, California. The midpoint of Sri Lanka is further east by approximately 13,695 miles (22,040km).
No, Sri Lanka is not further north than Lancaster, California.
Yes, Sri Lanka is further south than Lancaster, California. The midpoint of Sri Lanka is further south by approximately 1,854 miles (2,983km).
The midpoint of Lancaster, California is approximately 9,247 miles (14,881km) east of Sri Lanka.
Yes, Lancaster, California is further west than Sri Lanka. The midpoint of Lancaster, California is further west by approximately 13,695 miles (22,040km).
No, Lancaster, California is not further east than Sri Lanka.
Yes, Lancaster, California is further north than Sri Lanka. The midpoint of Lancaster, California is further north by approximately 1,854 miles (2,983km).
No, Lancaster, California is not further south than Sri Lanka.
Yes, Sri Lanka is more populated than Lancaster.
Sri Lanka has a population of 23,187,516 and Lancaster has a population of 161,103
which means that Sri Lanka has 23,026,413 more people than Lancaster.
That makes Sri Lanka 144 times more populated than Lancaster.
No, Sri Lanka is not less populated than Lancaster.
Sri Lanka has a population of 23,187,516 and Lancaster has a population of 161,103
which means that Sri Lanka has 23,026,413 more people than Lancaster.
That makes Sri Lanka 144 times more populated than Lancaster.
No, Lancaster is not more populated than Sri Lanka.
Lancaster has a population of 161,103 and Sri Lanka has a population of 23,187,516
which means that Lancaster has 23,026,413 fewer people than Sri Lanka.
That makes Lancaster 144 times less populated than Sri Lanka.
Yes, Lancaster is less populated than Sri Lanka.
Lancaster has a population of 161,103 and Sri Lanka has a population of 23,187,516
which means that Lancaster has 23,026,413 fewer people than Sri Lanka.
That makes Lancaster 144 times less populated than Sri Lanka.