On average across the year,
yes, Sri Lanka is hotter than
Las Vegas, Nevada
.
Sri Lanka has an average temperature of 26°C/79°F and Las Vegas, Nevada has an average temperature of 22°C/72°F.
Sri Lanka's hottest month is April, with an average maximum temperature of 31°C/88°F, which is not hotter than Las Vegas, Nevada's hottest month (July, with an average maximum temperature of 40°C/104°F).
On average across the year, no, Sri Lanka is not colder than Las Vegas, Nevada . Sri Lanka has an average minimum temperature of 22°C/72°F and Las Vegas, Nevada has an average minimum temperature of 16°C/61°F.
On average across the year,
yes, Sri Lanka has more rain than
Las Vegas, Nevada. Sri Lanka has an average annual rainfall of 1648mm and Las Vegas, Nevada has an average annual rainfall of 97mm.
Sri Lanka's wettest month is November, with an average monthly rainfall of 254mm, which is wetter than Las Vegas, Nevada's wettest month (January, with an average monthly rainfall of 14mm).
The midpoint of Sri Lanka is approximately 9,223 miles (14,843km) west of Las Vegas, Nevada.
No, Sri Lanka is not further west than Las Vegas, Nevada.
Yes, Sri Lanka is further east than Las Vegas, Nevada. The midpoint of Sri Lanka is further east by approximately 13,470 miles (21,678km).
No, Sri Lanka is not further north than Las Vegas, Nevada.
Yes, Sri Lanka is further south than Las Vegas, Nevada. The midpoint of Sri Lanka is further south by approximately 1,955 miles (3,147km).
The midpoint of Las Vegas, Nevada is approximately 9,223 miles (14,843km) east of Sri Lanka.
Yes, Las Vegas, Nevada is further west than Sri Lanka. The midpoint of Las Vegas, Nevada is further west by approximately 13,470 miles (21,678km).
No, Las Vegas, Nevada is not further east than Sri Lanka.
Yes, Las Vegas, Nevada is further north than Sri Lanka. The midpoint of Las Vegas, Nevada is further north by approximately 1,955 miles (3,147km).
No, Las Vegas, Nevada is not further south than Sri Lanka.
Yes, Sri Lanka is more populated than Las Vegas.
Sri Lanka has a population of 23,187,516 and Las Vegas has a population of 623,747
which means that Sri Lanka has 22,563,769 more people than Las Vegas.
That makes Sri Lanka 37 times more populated than Las Vegas.
No, Sri Lanka is not less populated than Las Vegas.
Sri Lanka has a population of 23,187,516 and Las Vegas has a population of 623,747
which means that Sri Lanka has 22,563,769 more people than Las Vegas.
That makes Sri Lanka 37 times more populated than Las Vegas.
No, Las Vegas is not more populated than Sri Lanka.
Las Vegas has a population of 623,747 and Sri Lanka has a population of 23,187,516
which means that Las Vegas has 22,563,769 fewer people than Sri Lanka.
That makes Las Vegas 37 times less populated than Sri Lanka.
Yes, Las Vegas is less populated than Sri Lanka.
Las Vegas has a population of 623,747 and Sri Lanka has a population of 23,187,516
which means that Las Vegas has 22,563,769 fewer people than Sri Lanka.
That makes Las Vegas 37 times less populated than Sri Lanka.