On average across the year,
yes, Sri Lanka is hotter than
New Hampshire, United States
.
Sri Lanka has an average temperature of 26°C/79°F and New Hampshire, United States has an average temperature of 9°C/48°F.
Sri Lanka's hottest month is April, with an average maximum temperature of 31°C/88°F, which is hotter than New Hampshire, United States's hottest month (July, with an average maximum temperature of 29°C/84°F).
On average across the year, no, Sri Lanka is not colder than New Hampshire, United States . Sri Lanka has an average minimum temperature of 22°C/72°F and New Hampshire, United States has an average minimum temperature of 3°C/37°F.
On average across the year,
yes, Sri Lanka has more rain than
New Hampshire, United States. Sri Lanka has an average annual rainfall of 1648mm and New Hampshire, United States has an average annual rainfall of 1196mm.
Sri Lanka's wettest month is November, with an average monthly rainfall of 254mm, which is wetter than New Hampshire, United States's wettest month (October, with an average monthly rainfall of 130mm).
The midpoint of Sri Lanka is approximately 8,505 miles (13,687km) east of New Hampshire, United States.
No, Sri Lanka is not further west than New Hampshire, United States.
Yes, Sri Lanka is further east than New Hampshire, United States. The midpoint of Sri Lanka is further east by approximately 10,385 miles (16,713km).
No, Sri Lanka is not further north than New Hampshire, United States.
Yes, Sri Lanka is further south than New Hampshire, United States. The midpoint of Sri Lanka is further south by approximately 2,440 miles (3,927km).
Yes, Sri Lanka is bigger than New Hampshire.
Sri Lanka has an area of 64,630 km2 (167,392 miles2) and New Hampshire has an area of 24,214 km2 (62,714 miles2)
which means that Sri Lanka is 40,416 km2 (104,677 miles2) bigger than New Hampshire.
That makes Sri Lanka 3 times bigger than New Hampshire.
No, Sri Lanka is not smaller than New Hampshire.
Sri Lanka has an area of 64,630 km2 (167,392 miles2) and New Hampshire has an area of 24,214 km2 (62,714 miles2)
which means that Sri Lanka is 40,416 km2 (104,677 miles2) bigger than New Hampshire.
That makes Sri Lanka 3 times bigger than New Hampshire.
The midpoint of New Hampshire, United States is approximately 8,505 miles (13,687km) west of Sri Lanka.
Yes, New Hampshire, United States is further west than Sri Lanka. The midpoint of New Hampshire, United States is further west by approximately 10,385 miles (16,713km).
No, New Hampshire, United States is not further east than Sri Lanka.
Yes, New Hampshire, United States is further north than Sri Lanka. The midpoint of New Hampshire, United States is further north by approximately 2,440 miles (3,927km).
No, New Hampshire, United States is not further south than Sri Lanka.
No, New Hampshire is smaller than Sri Lanka.
New Hampshire has an area of 24,214 km2 (62,714 miles2) and Sri Lanka has an area of 64,630 km2 (167,392 miles2)
which means that New Hampshire is 40,416 km2 (104,677 miles2) smaller than Sri Lanka.
That makes New Hampshire 3 times smaller than Sri Lanka.
Yes, New Hampshire is smaller than Sri Lanka.
New Hampshire has an area of 24,214 km2 (62,714 miles2) and Sri Lanka has an area of 64,630 km2 (167,392 miles2)
which means that New Hampshire is 40,416 km2 (104,677 miles2) smaller than Sri Lanka.
That makes New Hampshire 3 times smaller than Sri Lanka.
Yes, Sri Lanka is more populated than New Hampshire.
Sri Lanka has a population of 23,187,516 and New Hampshire has a population of 1,388,992
which means that Sri Lanka has 21,798,524 more people than New Hampshire.
That makes Sri Lanka 17 times more populated than New Hampshire.
No, Sri Lanka is not less populated than New Hampshire.
Sri Lanka has a population of 23,187,516 and New Hampshire has a population of 1,388,992
which means that Sri Lanka has 21,798,524 more people than New Hampshire.
That makes Sri Lanka 17 times more populated than New Hampshire.
No, New Hampshire is not more populated than Sri Lanka.
New Hampshire has a population of 1,388,992 and Sri Lanka has a population of 23,187,516
which means that New Hampshire has 21,798,524 fewer people than Sri Lanka.
That makes New Hampshire 17 times less populated than Sri Lanka.
Yes, New Hampshire is less populated than Sri Lanka.
New Hampshire has a population of 1,388,992 and Sri Lanka has a population of 23,187,516
which means that New Hampshire has 21,798,524 fewer people than Sri Lanka.
That makes New Hampshire 17 times less populated than Sri Lanka.