On average across the year,
yes, Sri Lanka is hotter than
Pasadena, California
.
Sri Lanka has an average temperature of 26°C/79°F and Pasadena, California has an average temperature of 19°C/66°F.
Sri Lanka's hottest month is April, with an average maximum temperature of 31°C/88°F, which is hotter than Pasadena, California's hottest month (August, with an average maximum temperature of 29°C/84°F).
On average across the year, no, Sri Lanka is not colder than Pasadena, California . Sri Lanka has an average minimum temperature of 22°C/72°F and Pasadena, California has an average minimum temperature of 14°C/57°F.
On average across the year,
yes, Sri Lanka has more rain than
Pasadena, California. Sri Lanka has an average annual rainfall of 1648mm and Pasadena, California has an average annual rainfall of 306mm.
Sri Lanka's wettest month is November, with an average monthly rainfall of 254mm, which is wetter than Pasadena, California's wettest month (December, with an average monthly rainfall of 78mm).
The midpoint of Sri Lanka is approximately 9,280 miles (14,935km) west of Pasadena, California.
No, Sri Lanka is not further west than Pasadena, California.
Yes, Sri Lanka is further east than Pasadena, California. The midpoint of Sri Lanka is further east by approximately 13,701 miles (22,050km).
No, Sri Lanka is not further north than Pasadena, California.
Yes, Sri Lanka is further south than Pasadena, California. The midpoint of Sri Lanka is further south by approximately 1,815 miles (2,921km).
The midpoint of Pasadena, California is approximately 9,280 miles (14,935km) east of Sri Lanka.
Yes, Pasadena, California is further west than Sri Lanka. The midpoint of Pasadena, California is further west by approximately 13,701 miles (22,050km).
No, Pasadena, California is not further east than Sri Lanka.
Yes, Pasadena, California is further north than Sri Lanka. The midpoint of Pasadena, California is further north by approximately 1,815 miles (2,921km).
No, Pasadena, California is not further south than Sri Lanka.
Yes, Sri Lanka is more populated than Pasadena.
Sri Lanka has a population of 23,187,516 and Pasadena has a population of 142,250
which means that Sri Lanka has 23,045,266 more people than Pasadena.
That makes Sri Lanka 163 times more populated than Pasadena.
No, Sri Lanka is not less populated than Pasadena.
Sri Lanka has a population of 23,187,516 and Pasadena has a population of 142,250
which means that Sri Lanka has 23,045,266 more people than Pasadena.
That makes Sri Lanka 163 times more populated than Pasadena.
No, Pasadena is not more populated than Sri Lanka.
Pasadena has a population of 142,250 and Sri Lanka has a population of 23,187,516
which means that Pasadena has 23,045,266 fewer people than Sri Lanka.
That makes Pasadena 163 times less populated than Sri Lanka.
Yes, Pasadena is less populated than Sri Lanka.
Pasadena has a population of 142,250 and Sri Lanka has a population of 23,187,516
which means that Pasadena has 23,045,266 fewer people than Sri Lanka.
That makes Pasadena 163 times less populated than Sri Lanka.