On average across the year,
yes, Sri Lanka is hotter than
Pittsburg, California
.
Sri Lanka has an average temperature of 26°C/79°F and Pittsburg, California has an average temperature of 17°C/63°F.
Sri Lanka's hottest month is April, with an average maximum temperature of 31°C/88°F, which is not hotter than Pittsburg, California's hottest month (July, with an average maximum temperature of 32°C/90°F).
On average across the year, no, Sri Lanka is not colder than Pittsburg, California . Sri Lanka has an average minimum temperature of 22°C/72°F and Pittsburg, California has an average minimum temperature of 10°C/50°F.
On average across the year,
yes, Sri Lanka has more rain than
Pittsburg, California. Sri Lanka has an average annual rainfall of 1648mm and Pittsburg, California has an average annual rainfall of 400mm.
Sri Lanka's wettest month is November, with an average monthly rainfall of 254mm, which is wetter than Pittsburg, California's wettest month (March, with an average monthly rainfall of 74mm).
The midpoint of Sri Lanka is approximately 8,945 miles (14,396km) west of Pittsburg, California.
No, Sri Lanka is not further west than Pittsburg, California.
Yes, Sri Lanka is further east than Pittsburg, California. The midpoint of Sri Lanka is further east by approximately 13,908 miles (22,383km).
No, Sri Lanka is not further north than Pittsburg, California.
Yes, Sri Lanka is further south than Pittsburg, California. The midpoint of Sri Lanka is further south by approximately 2,083 miles (3,353km).
The midpoint of Pittsburg, California is approximately 8,945 miles (14,396km) east of Sri Lanka.
Yes, Pittsburg, California is further west than Sri Lanka. The midpoint of Pittsburg, California is further west by approximately 13,908 miles (22,383km).
No, Pittsburg, California is not further east than Sri Lanka.
Yes, Pittsburg, California is further north than Sri Lanka. The midpoint of Pittsburg, California is further north by approximately 2,083 miles (3,353km).
No, Pittsburg, California is not further south than Sri Lanka.
Yes, Sri Lanka is more populated than Pittsburg.
Sri Lanka has a population of 23,187,516 and Pittsburg has a population of 69,424
which means that Sri Lanka has 23,118,092 more people than Pittsburg.
That makes Sri Lanka 334 times more populated than Pittsburg.
No, Sri Lanka is not less populated than Pittsburg.
Sri Lanka has a population of 23,187,516 and Pittsburg has a population of 69,424
which means that Sri Lanka has 23,118,092 more people than Pittsburg.
That makes Sri Lanka 334 times more populated than Pittsburg.
No, Pittsburg is not more populated than Sri Lanka.
Pittsburg has a population of 69,424 and Sri Lanka has a population of 23,187,516
which means that Pittsburg has 23,118,092 fewer people than Sri Lanka.
That makes Pittsburg 334 times less populated than Sri Lanka.
Yes, Pittsburg is less populated than Sri Lanka.
Pittsburg has a population of 69,424 and Sri Lanka has a population of 23,187,516
which means that Pittsburg has 23,118,092 fewer people than Sri Lanka.
That makes Pittsburg 334 times less populated than Sri Lanka.