On average across the year,
yes, Sri Lanka is hotter than
Rancho Cucamonga, California
.
Sri Lanka has an average temperature of 26°C/79°F and Rancho Cucamonga, California has an average temperature of 20°C/68°F.
Sri Lanka's hottest month is April, with an average maximum temperature of 31°C/88°F, which is not hotter than Rancho Cucamonga, California's hottest month (August, with an average maximum temperature of 35°C/95°F).
On average across the year, no, Sri Lanka is not colder than Rancho Cucamonga, California . Sri Lanka has an average minimum temperature of 22°C/72°F and Rancho Cucamonga, California has an average minimum temperature of 13°C/55°F.
On average across the year,
yes, Sri Lanka has more rain than
Rancho Cucamonga, California. Sri Lanka has an average annual rainfall of 1648mm and Rancho Cucamonga, California has an average annual rainfall of 280mm.
Sri Lanka's wettest month is November, with an average monthly rainfall of 254mm, which is wetter than Rancho Cucamonga, California's wettest month (December, with an average monthly rainfall of 70mm).
The midpoint of Sri Lanka is approximately 9,297 miles (14,962km) west of Rancho Cucamonga, California.
No, Sri Lanka is not further west than Rancho Cucamonga, California.
Yes, Sri Lanka is further east than Rancho Cucamonga, California. The midpoint of Sri Lanka is further east by approximately 13,664 miles (21,990km).
No, Sri Lanka is not further north than Rancho Cucamonga, California.
Yes, Sri Lanka is further south than Rancho Cucamonga, California. The midpoint of Sri Lanka is further south by approximately 1,813 miles (2,917km).
The midpoint of Rancho Cucamonga, California is approximately 9,297 miles (14,962km) east of Sri Lanka.
Yes, Rancho Cucamonga, California is further west than Sri Lanka. The midpoint of Rancho Cucamonga, California is further west by approximately 13,664 miles (21,990km).
No, Rancho Cucamonga, California is not further east than Sri Lanka.
Yes, Rancho Cucamonga, California is further north than Sri Lanka. The midpoint of Rancho Cucamonga, California is further north by approximately 1,813 miles (2,917km).
No, Rancho Cucamonga, California is not further south than Sri Lanka.
Yes, Sri Lanka is more populated than Rancho Cucamonga.
Sri Lanka has a population of 23,187,516 and Rancho Cucamonga has a population of 175,236
which means that Sri Lanka has 23,012,280 more people than Rancho Cucamonga.
That makes Sri Lanka 132 times more populated than Rancho Cucamonga.
No, Sri Lanka is not less populated than Rancho Cucamonga.
Sri Lanka has a population of 23,187,516 and Rancho Cucamonga has a population of 175,236
which means that Sri Lanka has 23,012,280 more people than Rancho Cucamonga.
That makes Sri Lanka 132 times more populated than Rancho Cucamonga.
No, Rancho Cucamonga is not more populated than Sri Lanka.
Rancho Cucamonga has a population of 175,236 and Sri Lanka has a population of 23,187,516
which means that Rancho Cucamonga has 23,012,280 fewer people than Sri Lanka.
That makes Rancho Cucamonga 132 times less populated than Sri Lanka.
Yes, Rancho Cucamonga is less populated than Sri Lanka.
Rancho Cucamonga has a population of 175,236 and Sri Lanka has a population of 23,187,516
which means that Rancho Cucamonga has 23,012,280 fewer people than Sri Lanka.
That makes Rancho Cucamonga 132 times less populated than Sri Lanka.