On average across the year,
yes, Sri Lanka is hotter than
San Francisco, California
.
Sri Lanka has an average temperature of 26°C/79°F and San Francisco, California has an average temperature of 15°C/59°F.
Sri Lanka's hottest month is April, with an average maximum temperature of 31°C/88°F, which is hotter than San Francisco, California's hottest month (September, with an average maximum temperature of 24°C/75°F).
On average across the year, no, Sri Lanka is not colder than San Francisco, California . Sri Lanka has an average minimum temperature of 22°C/72°F and San Francisco, California has an average minimum temperature of 10°C/50°F.
On average across the year,
yes, Sri Lanka has more rain than
San Francisco, California. Sri Lanka has an average annual rainfall of 1648mm and San Francisco, California has an average annual rainfall of 455mm.
Sri Lanka's wettest month is November, with an average monthly rainfall of 254mm, which is wetter than San Francisco, California's wettest month (December, with an average monthly rainfall of 98mm).
The midpoint of Sri Lanka is approximately 8,946 miles (14,397km) west of San Francisco, California.
No, Sri Lanka is not further west than San Francisco, California.
Yes, Sri Lanka is further east than San Francisco, California. The midpoint of Sri Lanka is further east by approximately 13,948 miles (22,447km).
No, Sri Lanka is not further north than San Francisco, California.
Yes, Sri Lanka is further south than San Francisco, California. The midpoint of Sri Lanka is further south by approximately 2,066 miles (3,325km).
The midpoint of San Francisco, California is approximately 8,946 miles (14,397km) east of Sri Lanka.
Yes, San Francisco, California is further west than Sri Lanka. The midpoint of San Francisco, California is further west by approximately 13,948 miles (22,447km).
No, San Francisco, California is not further east than Sri Lanka.
Yes, San Francisco, California is further north than Sri Lanka. The midpoint of San Francisco, California is further north by approximately 2,066 miles (3,325km).
No, San Francisco, California is not further south than Sri Lanka.
Yes, Sri Lanka is more populated than San Francisco.
Sri Lanka has a population of 23,187,516 and San Francisco has a population of 864,816
which means that Sri Lanka has 22,322,700 more people than San Francisco.
That makes Sri Lanka 27 times more populated than San Francisco.
No, Sri Lanka is not less populated than San Francisco.
Sri Lanka has a population of 23,187,516 and San Francisco has a population of 864,816
which means that Sri Lanka has 22,322,700 more people than San Francisco.
That makes Sri Lanka 27 times more populated than San Francisco.
No, San Francisco is not more populated than Sri Lanka.
San Francisco has a population of 864,816 and Sri Lanka has a population of 23,187,516
which means that San Francisco has 22,322,700 fewer people than Sri Lanka.
That makes San Francisco 27 times less populated than Sri Lanka.
Yes, San Francisco is less populated than Sri Lanka.
San Francisco has a population of 864,816 and Sri Lanka has a population of 23,187,516
which means that San Francisco has 22,322,700 fewer people than Sri Lanka.
That makes San Francisco 27 times less populated than Sri Lanka.