On average across the year,
yes, Sri Lanka is hotter than
Sioux Falls, South Dakota
.
Sri Lanka has an average temperature of 26°C/79°F and Sioux Falls, South Dakota has an average temperature of 9°C/48°F.
Sri Lanka's hottest month is April, with an average maximum temperature of 31°C/88°F, which is hotter than Sioux Falls, South Dakota's hottest month (July, with an average maximum temperature of 30°C/86°F).
On average across the year, no, Sri Lanka is not colder than Sioux Falls, South Dakota . Sri Lanka has an average minimum temperature of 22°C/72°F and Sioux Falls, South Dakota has an average minimum temperature of 3°C/37°F.
On average across the year,
yes, Sri Lanka has more rain than
Sioux Falls, South Dakota. Sri Lanka has an average annual rainfall of 1648mm and Sioux Falls, South Dakota has an average annual rainfall of 781mm.
Sri Lanka's wettest month is November, with an average monthly rainfall of 254mm, which is wetter than Sioux Falls, South Dakota's wettest month (June, with an average monthly rainfall of 119mm).
The midpoint of Sri Lanka is approximately 8,880 miles (14,291km) east of Sioux Falls, South Dakota.
No, Sri Lanka is not further west than Sioux Falls, South Dakota.
Yes, Sri Lanka is further east than Sioux Falls, South Dakota. The midpoint of Sri Lanka is further east by approximately 12,091 miles (19,459km).
No, Sri Lanka is not further north than Sioux Falls, South Dakota.
Yes, Sri Lanka is further south than Sioux Falls, South Dakota. The midpoint of Sri Lanka is further south by approximately 2,465 miles (3,967km).
The midpoint of Sioux Falls, South Dakota is approximately 8,880 miles (14,291km) west of Sri Lanka.
Yes, Sioux Falls, South Dakota is further west than Sri Lanka. The midpoint of Sioux Falls, South Dakota is further west by approximately 12,091 miles (19,459km).
No, Sioux Falls, South Dakota is not further east than Sri Lanka.
Yes, Sioux Falls, South Dakota is further north than Sri Lanka. The midpoint of Sioux Falls, South Dakota is further north by approximately 2,465 miles (3,967km).
No, Sioux Falls, South Dakota is not further south than Sri Lanka.
Yes, Sri Lanka is more populated than Sioux Falls.
Sri Lanka has a population of 23,187,516 and Sioux Falls has a population of 171,544
which means that Sri Lanka has 23,015,972 more people than Sioux Falls.
That makes Sri Lanka 135 times more populated than Sioux Falls.
No, Sri Lanka is not less populated than Sioux Falls.
Sri Lanka has a population of 23,187,516 and Sioux Falls has a population of 171,544
which means that Sri Lanka has 23,015,972 more people than Sioux Falls.
That makes Sri Lanka 135 times more populated than Sioux Falls.
No, Sioux Falls is not more populated than Sri Lanka.
Sioux Falls has a population of 171,544 and Sri Lanka has a population of 23,187,516
which means that Sioux Falls has 23,015,972 fewer people than Sri Lanka.
That makes Sioux Falls 135 times less populated than Sri Lanka.
Yes, Sioux Falls is less populated than Sri Lanka.
Sioux Falls has a population of 171,544 and Sri Lanka has a population of 23,187,516
which means that Sioux Falls has 23,015,972 fewer people than Sri Lanka.
That makes Sioux Falls 135 times less populated than Sri Lanka.