On average across the year,
yes, Sri Lanka is hotter than
South Dakota, United States
.
Sri Lanka has an average temperature of 26°C/79°F and South Dakota, United States has an average temperature of 8°C/46°F.
Sri Lanka's hottest month is April, with an average maximum temperature of 31°C/88°F, which is hotter than South Dakota, United States's hottest month (July, with an average maximum temperature of 30°C/86°F).
On average across the year, no, Sri Lanka is not colder than South Dakota, United States . Sri Lanka has an average minimum temperature of 22°C/72°F and South Dakota, United States has an average minimum temperature of 1°C/34°F.
On average across the year,
yes, Sri Lanka has more rain than
South Dakota, United States. Sri Lanka has an average annual rainfall of 1648mm and South Dakota, United States has an average annual rainfall of 498mm.
Sri Lanka's wettest month is November, with an average monthly rainfall of 254mm, which is wetter than South Dakota, United States's wettest month (May, with an average monthly rainfall of 74mm).
The midpoint of Sri Lanka is approximately 8,855 miles (14,250km) west of South Dakota, United States.
No, Sri Lanka is not further west than South Dakota, United States.
Yes, Sri Lanka is further east than South Dakota, United States. The midpoint of Sri Lanka is further east by approximately 12,301 miles (19,797km).
No, Sri Lanka is not further north than South Dakota, United States.
Yes, Sri Lanka is further south than South Dakota, United States. The midpoint of Sri Lanka is further south by approximately 2,494 miles (4,014km).
No, Sri Lanka is smaller than South Dakota.
Sri Lanka has an area of 64,630 km2 (167,392 miles2) and South Dakota has an area of 199,729 km2 (517,298 miles2)
which means that Sri Lanka is 135,099 km2 (349,906 miles2) smaller than South Dakota.
That makes Sri Lanka 3 times smaller than South Dakota.
Yes, Sri Lanka is smaller than South Dakota.
Sri Lanka has an area of 64,630 km2 (167,392 miles2) and South Dakota has an area of 199,729 km2 (517,298 miles2)
which means that Sri Lanka is 135,099 km2 (349,906 miles2) smaller than South Dakota.
That makes Sri Lanka 3 times smaller than South Dakota.
The midpoint of South Dakota, United States is approximately 8,855 miles (14,250km) east of Sri Lanka.
Yes, South Dakota, United States is further west than Sri Lanka. The midpoint of South Dakota, United States is further west by approximately 12,301 miles (19,797km).
No, South Dakota, United States is not further east than Sri Lanka.
Yes, South Dakota, United States is further north than Sri Lanka. The midpoint of South Dakota, United States is further north by approximately 2,494 miles (4,014km).
No, South Dakota, United States is not further south than Sri Lanka.
Yes, South Dakota is bigger than Sri Lanka.
South Dakota has an area of 199,729 km2 (517,298 miles2) and Sri Lanka has an area of 64,630 km2 (167,392 miles2)
which means that South Dakota is 135,099 km2 (349,906 miles2) bigger than Sri Lanka.
That makes South Dakota 3 times bigger than Sri Lanka.
No, South Dakota is not smaller than Sri Lanka.
South Dakota has an area of 199,729 km2 (517,298 miles2) and Sri Lanka has an area of 64,630 km2 (167,392 miles2)
which means that South Dakota is 135,099 km2 (349,906 miles2) bigger than Sri Lanka.
That makes South Dakota 3 times bigger than Sri Lanka.
Yes, Sri Lanka is more populated than South Dakota.
Sri Lanka has a population of 23,187,516 and South Dakota has a population of 895,376
which means that Sri Lanka has 22,292,140 more people than South Dakota.
That makes Sri Lanka 26 times more populated than South Dakota.
No, Sri Lanka is not less populated than South Dakota.
Sri Lanka has a population of 23,187,516 and South Dakota has a population of 895,376
which means that Sri Lanka has 22,292,140 more people than South Dakota.
That makes Sri Lanka 26 times more populated than South Dakota.
No, South Dakota is not more populated than Sri Lanka.
South Dakota has a population of 895,376 and Sri Lanka has a population of 23,187,516
which means that South Dakota has 22,292,140 fewer people than Sri Lanka.
That makes South Dakota 26 times less populated than Sri Lanka.
Yes, South Dakota is less populated than Sri Lanka.
South Dakota has a population of 895,376 and Sri Lanka has a population of 23,187,516
which means that South Dakota has 22,292,140 fewer people than Sri Lanka.
That makes South Dakota 26 times less populated than Sri Lanka.