On average across the year,
yes, Sri Lanka is hotter than
South San Francisco, California
.
Sri Lanka has an average temperature of 26°C/79°F and South San Francisco, California has an average temperature of 15°C/59°F.
Sri Lanka's hottest month is April, with an average maximum temperature of 31°C/88°F, which is hotter than South San Francisco, California's hottest month (September, with an average maximum temperature of 24°C/75°F).
On average across the year, no, Sri Lanka is not colder than South San Francisco, California . Sri Lanka has an average minimum temperature of 22°C/72°F and South San Francisco, California has an average minimum temperature of 10°C/50°F.
On average across the year,
yes, Sri Lanka has more rain than
South San Francisco, California. Sri Lanka has an average annual rainfall of 1648mm and South San Francisco, California has an average annual rainfall of 455mm.
Sri Lanka's wettest month is November, with an average monthly rainfall of 254mm, which is wetter than South San Francisco, California's wettest month (December, with an average monthly rainfall of 98mm).
The midpoint of Sri Lanka is approximately 8,953 miles (14,409km) west of South San Francisco, California.
No, Sri Lanka is not further west than South San Francisco, California.
Yes, Sri Lanka is further east than South San Francisco, California. The midpoint of Sri Lanka is further east by approximately 13,949 miles (22,449km).
No, Sri Lanka is not further north than South San Francisco, California.
Yes, Sri Lanka is further south than South San Francisco, California. The midpoint of Sri Lanka is further south by approximately 2,057 miles (3,311km).
The midpoint of South San Francisco, California is approximately 8,953 miles (14,409km) east of Sri Lanka.
Yes, South San Francisco, California is further west than Sri Lanka. The midpoint of South San Francisco, California is further west by approximately 13,949 miles (22,449km).
No, South San Francisco, California is not further east than Sri Lanka.
Yes, South San Francisco, California is further north than Sri Lanka. The midpoint of South San Francisco, California is further north by approximately 2,057 miles (3,311km).
No, South San Francisco, California is not further south than Sri Lanka.
Yes, Sri Lanka is more populated than South San Francisco.
Sri Lanka has a population of 23,187,516 and South San Francisco has a population of 67,271
which means that Sri Lanka has 23,120,245 more people than South San Francisco.
That makes Sri Lanka 345 times more populated than South San Francisco.
No, Sri Lanka is not less populated than South San Francisco.
Sri Lanka has a population of 23,187,516 and South San Francisco has a population of 67,271
which means that Sri Lanka has 23,120,245 more people than South San Francisco.
That makes Sri Lanka 345 times more populated than South San Francisco.
No, South San Francisco is not more populated than Sri Lanka.
South San Francisco has a population of 67,271 and Sri Lanka has a population of 23,187,516
which means that South San Francisco has 23,120,245 fewer people than Sri Lanka.
That makes South San Francisco 345 times less populated than Sri Lanka.
Yes, South San Francisco is less populated than Sri Lanka.
South San Francisco has a population of 67,271 and Sri Lanka has a population of 23,187,516
which means that South San Francisco has 23,120,245 fewer people than Sri Lanka.
That makes South San Francisco 345 times less populated than Sri Lanka.