On average across the year,
yes, Sudan is hotter than
New Hampshire, United States
.
Sudan has an average temperature of 30°C/86°F and New Hampshire, United States has an average temperature of 9°C/48°F.
Sudan's hottest month is July, with an average maximum temperature of 41°C/106°F, which is hotter than New Hampshire, United States's hottest month (also July, with an average maximum temperature of 29°C/84°F).
On average across the year, no, Sudan is not colder than New Hampshire, United States . Sudan has an average minimum temperature of 23°C/73°F and New Hampshire, United States has an average minimum temperature of 3°C/37°F.
On average across the year,
no, Sudan has less rain than
New Hampshire, United States. Sudan has an average annual rainfall of 96mm and New Hampshire, United States has an average annual rainfall of 1196mm.
Sudan's wettest month is March, with an average monthly rainfall of 17mm, which is drier than New Hampshire, United States's wettest month (October, with an average monthly rainfall of 130mm).
The midpoint of Sudan is approximately 6,190 miles (9,962km) east of New Hampshire, United States.
No, Sudan is not further west than New Hampshire, United States.
Yes, Sudan is further east than New Hampshire, United States. The midpoint of Sudan is further east by approximately 7,035 miles (11,322km).
No, Sudan is not further north than New Hampshire, United States.
Yes, Sudan is further south than New Hampshire, United States. The midpoint of Sudan is further south by approximately 2,096 miles (3,373km).
Yes, Sudan is bigger than New Hampshire.
Sudan has an area of 1,861,484 km2 (4,821,244 miles2) and New Hampshire has an area of 24,214 km2 (62,714 miles2)
which means that Sudan is 1,837,270 km2 (4,758,529 miles2) bigger than New Hampshire.
That makes Sudan 77 times bigger than New Hampshire.
No, Sudan is not smaller than New Hampshire.
Sudan has an area of 1,861,484 km2 (4,821,244 miles2) and New Hampshire has an area of 24,214 km2 (62,714 miles2)
which means that Sudan is 1,837,270 km2 (4,758,529 miles2) bigger than New Hampshire.
That makes Sudan 77 times bigger than New Hampshire.
The midpoint of New Hampshire, United States is approximately 6,190 miles (9,962km) west of Sudan.
Yes, New Hampshire, United States is further west than Sudan. The midpoint of New Hampshire, United States is further west by approximately 7,035 miles (11,322km).
No, New Hampshire, United States is not further east than Sudan.
Yes, New Hampshire, United States is further north than Sudan. The midpoint of New Hampshire, United States is further north by approximately 2,096 miles (3,373km).
No, New Hampshire, United States is not further south than Sudan.
No, New Hampshire is smaller than Sudan.
New Hampshire has an area of 24,214 km2 (62,714 miles2) and Sudan has an area of 1,861,484 km2 (4,821,244 miles2)
which means that New Hampshire is 1,837,270 km2 (4,758,529 miles2) smaller than Sudan.
That makes New Hampshire 77 times smaller than Sudan.
Yes, New Hampshire is smaller than Sudan.
New Hampshire has an area of 24,214 km2 (62,714 miles2) and Sudan has an area of 1,861,484 km2 (4,821,244 miles2)
which means that New Hampshire is 1,837,270 km2 (4,758,529 miles2) smaller than Sudan.
That makes New Hampshire 77 times smaller than Sudan.
Yes, Sudan is more populated than New Hampshire.
Sudan has a population of 47,958,856 and New Hampshire has a population of 1,388,992
which means that Sudan has 46,569,864 more people than New Hampshire.
That makes Sudan 35 times more populated than New Hampshire.
No, Sudan is not less populated than New Hampshire.
Sudan has a population of 47,958,856 and New Hampshire has a population of 1,388,992
which means that Sudan has 46,569,864 more people than New Hampshire.
That makes Sudan 35 times more populated than New Hampshire.
No, New Hampshire is not more populated than Sudan.
New Hampshire has a population of 1,388,992 and Sudan has a population of 47,958,856
which means that New Hampshire has 46,569,864 fewer people than Sudan.
That makes New Hampshire 35 times less populated than Sudan.
Yes, New Hampshire is less populated than Sudan.
New Hampshire has a population of 1,388,992 and Sudan has a population of 47,958,856
which means that New Hampshire has 46,569,864 fewer people than Sudan.
That makes New Hampshire 35 times less populated than Sudan.