On average across the year,
yes, Sudan is hotter than
Omaha, Nebraska
.
Sudan has an average temperature of 30°C/86°F and Omaha, Nebraska has an average temperature of 12°C/54°F.
Sudan's hottest month is July, with an average maximum temperature of 41°C/106°F, which is hotter than Omaha, Nebraska's hottest month (also July, with an average maximum temperature of 31°C/88°F).
On average across the year, no, Sudan is not colder than Omaha, Nebraska . Sudan has an average minimum temperature of 23°C/73°F and Omaha, Nebraska has an average minimum temperature of 6°C/43°F.
On average across the year,
no, Sudan has less rain than
Omaha, Nebraska. Sudan has an average annual rainfall of 96mm and Omaha, Nebraska has an average annual rainfall of 896mm.
Sudan's wettest month is March, with an average monthly rainfall of 17mm, which is drier than Omaha, Nebraska's wettest month (August, with an average monthly rainfall of 149mm).
The midpoint of Sudan is approximately 7,365 miles (11,853km) east of Omaha, Nebraska.
No, Sudan is not further west than Omaha, Nebraska.
Yes, Sudan is further east than Omaha, Nebraska. The midpoint of Sudan is further east by approximately 8,724 miles (14,040km).
No, Sudan is not further north than Omaha, Nebraska.
Yes, Sudan is further south than Omaha, Nebraska. The midpoint of Sudan is further south by approximately 1,962 miles (3,157km).
The midpoint of Omaha, Nebraska is approximately 7,365 miles (11,853km) west of Sudan.
Yes, Omaha, Nebraska is further west than Sudan. The midpoint of Omaha, Nebraska is further west by approximately 8,724 miles (14,040km).
No, Omaha, Nebraska is not further east than Sudan.
Yes, Omaha, Nebraska is further north than Sudan. The midpoint of Omaha, Nebraska is further north by approximately 1,962 miles (3,157km).
No, Omaha, Nebraska is not further south than Sudan.
Yes, Sudan is more populated than Omaha.
Sudan has a population of 47,958,856 and Omaha has a population of 486,051
which means that Sudan has 47,472,805 more people than Omaha.
That makes Sudan 99 times more populated than Omaha.
No, Sudan is not less populated than Omaha.
Sudan has a population of 47,958,856 and Omaha has a population of 486,051
which means that Sudan has 47,472,805 more people than Omaha.
That makes Sudan 99 times more populated than Omaha.
No, Omaha is not more populated than Sudan.
Omaha has a population of 486,051 and Sudan has a population of 47,958,856
which means that Omaha has 47,472,805 fewer people than Sudan.
That makes Omaha 99 times less populated than Sudan.
Yes, Omaha is less populated than Sudan.
Omaha has a population of 486,051 and Sudan has a population of 47,958,856
which means that Omaha has 47,472,805 fewer people than Sudan.
That makes Omaha 99 times less populated than Sudan.