On average across the year,
yes, Wallis and Futuna is hotter than
Bismarck, North Dakota
.
Wallis and Futuna has an average temperature of 28°C/82°F and Bismarck, North Dakota has an average temperature of 7°C/45°F.
Wallis and Futuna's hottest month is January, with an average maximum temperature of 32°C/90°F, which is hotter than Bismarck, North Dakota's hottest month (July, with an average maximum temperature of 30°C/86°F).
On average across the year, no, Wallis and Futuna is not colder than Bismarck, North Dakota . Wallis and Futuna has an average minimum temperature of 25°C/77°F and Bismarck, North Dakota has an average minimum temperature of 0°C/32°F.
On average across the year,
yes, Wallis and Futuna has more rain than
Bismarck, North Dakota. Wallis and Futuna has an average annual rainfall of 1695mm and Bismarck, North Dakota has an average annual rainfall of 515mm.
Wallis and Futuna's wettest month is February, with an average monthly rainfall of 254mm, which is wetter than Bismarck, North Dakota's wettest month (June, with an average monthly rainfall of 83mm).
The midpoint of Wallis and Futuna is approximately 6,355 miles (10,228km) south west of Bismarck, North Dakota.
Yes, Wallis and Futuna is further west than Bismarck, North Dakota. The midpoint of Wallis and Futuna is further west by approximately 3,793 miles (6,104km).
No, Wallis and Futuna is not further east than Bismarck, North Dakota.
No, Wallis and Futuna is not further north than Bismarck, North Dakota.
Yes, Wallis and Futuna is further south than Bismarck, North Dakota. The midpoint of Wallis and Futuna is further south by approximately 4,222 miles (6,794km).
The midpoint of Bismarck, North Dakota is approximately 6,355 miles (10,228km) north east of Wallis and Futuna.
No, Bismarck, North Dakota is not further west than Wallis and Futuna.
Yes, Bismarck, North Dakota is further east than Wallis and Futuna. The midpoint of Bismarck, North Dakota is further east by approximately 3,793 miles (6,104km).
Yes, Bismarck, North Dakota is further north than Wallis and Futuna. The midpoint of Bismarck, North Dakota is further north by approximately 4,222 miles (6,794km).
No, Bismarck, North Dakota is not further south than Wallis and Futuna.
No, Wallis and Futuna is not more populated than Bismarck.
Wallis and Futuna has a population of 15,891 and Bismarck has a population of 71,167
which means that Wallis and Futuna has 55,276 fewer people than Bismarck.
That makes Wallis and Futuna 5 times less populated than Bismarck.
Yes, Wallis and Futuna is less populated than Bismarck.
Wallis and Futuna has a population of 15,891 and Bismarck has a population of 71,167
which means that Wallis and Futuna has 55,276 fewer people than Bismarck.
That makes Wallis and Futuna 5 times less populated than Bismarck.
Yes, Bismarck is more populated than Wallis and Futuna.
Bismarck has a population of 71,167 and Wallis and Futuna has a population of 15,891
which means that Bismarck has 55,276 more people than Wallis and Futuna.
That makes Bismarck 5 times more populated than Wallis and Futuna.
No, Bismarck is not less populated than Wallis and Futuna.
Bismarck has a population of 71,167 and Wallis and Futuna has a population of 15,891
which means that Bismarck has 55,276 more people than Wallis and Futuna.
That makes Bismarck 5 times more populated than Wallis and Futuna.