On average across the year,
yes, Wallis and Futuna is hotter than
Rancho Cucamonga, California
.
Wallis and Futuna has an average temperature of 28°C/82°F and Rancho Cucamonga, California has an average temperature of 20°C/68°F.
Wallis and Futuna's hottest month is January, with an average maximum temperature of 32°C/90°F, which is not hotter than Rancho Cucamonga, California's hottest month (August, with an average maximum temperature of 35°C/95°F).
On average across the year, no, Wallis and Futuna is not colder than Rancho Cucamonga, California . Wallis and Futuna has an average minimum temperature of 25°C/77°F and Rancho Cucamonga, California has an average minimum temperature of 13°C/55°F.
On average across the year,
yes, Wallis and Futuna has more rain than
Rancho Cucamonga, California. Wallis and Futuna has an average annual rainfall of 1695mm and Rancho Cucamonga, California has an average annual rainfall of 280mm.
Wallis and Futuna's wettest month is February, with an average monthly rainfall of 254mm, which is wetter than Rancho Cucamonga, California's wettest month (December, with an average monthly rainfall of 70mm).
The midpoint of Wallis and Futuna is approximately 5,192 miles (8,356km) south west of Rancho Cucamonga, California.
Yes, Wallis and Futuna is further west than Rancho Cucamonga, California. The midpoint of Wallis and Futuna is further west by approximately 3,277 miles (5,274km).
No, Wallis and Futuna is not further east than Rancho Cucamonga, California.
No, Wallis and Futuna is not further north than Rancho Cucamonga, California.
Yes, Wallis and Futuna is further south than Rancho Cucamonga, California. The midpoint of Wallis and Futuna is further south by approximately 3,344 miles (5,382km).
The midpoint of Rancho Cucamonga, California is approximately 5,192 miles (8,356km) north east of Wallis and Futuna.
No, Rancho Cucamonga, California is not further west than Wallis and Futuna.
Yes, Rancho Cucamonga, California is further east than Wallis and Futuna. The midpoint of Rancho Cucamonga, California is further east by approximately 3,277 miles (5,274km).
Yes, Rancho Cucamonga, California is further north than Wallis and Futuna. The midpoint of Rancho Cucamonga, California is further north by approximately 3,344 miles (5,382km).
No, Rancho Cucamonga, California is not further south than Wallis and Futuna.
No, Wallis and Futuna is not more populated than Rancho Cucamonga.
Wallis and Futuna has a population of 15,891 and Rancho Cucamonga has a population of 175,236
which means that Wallis and Futuna has 159,345 fewer people than Rancho Cucamonga.
That makes Wallis and Futuna 11 times less populated than Rancho Cucamonga.
Yes, Wallis and Futuna is less populated than Rancho Cucamonga.
Wallis and Futuna has a population of 15,891 and Rancho Cucamonga has a population of 175,236
which means that Wallis and Futuna has 159,345 fewer people than Rancho Cucamonga.
That makes Wallis and Futuna 11 times less populated than Rancho Cucamonga.
Yes, Rancho Cucamonga is more populated than Wallis and Futuna.
Rancho Cucamonga has a population of 175,236 and Wallis and Futuna has a population of 15,891
which means that Rancho Cucamonga has 159,345 more people than Wallis and Futuna.
That makes Rancho Cucamonga 11 times more populated than Wallis and Futuna.
No, Rancho Cucamonga is not less populated than Wallis and Futuna.
Rancho Cucamonga has a population of 175,236 and Wallis and Futuna has a population of 15,891
which means that Rancho Cucamonga has 159,345 more people than Wallis and Futuna.
That makes Rancho Cucamonga 11 times more populated than Wallis and Futuna.